Author: 杨 全荣

  • Doctrinal Synthesis Paper

    Brief Statement

    God’s Revelation and Scripture

    The Christians’ Bible is God’s inspired words (2 Pet 1:20-21) by the work of the Holy Spirit through human authors to reveal God’s redemption plan for mankind. It is inerrant and truthful in everything it affirms to be true (John 17:17). All creations, especially the church, are under the authority of the Bible (Ps 119:89). The Bible is sufficient in its teachings for salvation, including godly Christians living and service (2 Tim 3:16).

    The Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit:

    God is Trinity, eternally exists in three persons, namely God the Father, God the Son Jesus Christ, and God the Holy Spirit (Matt 28:19). They are one in essence, equal in glory, distinct in relations, and indwelling in each other (Matt 3:16-17). Jesus Christ, who is eternally begotten from the Father (John 1:18) outside of time, is fully God (John 1:1-3) and fully man (Rom 1:3). The Holy Spirit is God (2 Co 3:17-19). He is the third person of the Trinity (Matt 28:19). He has the attributes, works, and titles of God (2 Cor 13:14).

    Creation, Humanity, and Sin

    The Triune God created this universe out of nothing (Gen 1:1). Lucifer, a high-ranking angel, wanted to be worshipped like God. So he became Satan and led one-third of the angels to rebel against God (Rev 12:4). God created humankind in His image so that we can be His representatives to rule over all His creations (Gen 1:26-28). However, Adam and Eve were tempted by Satan and disobeyed God. Their disobedience has caused this world to fall into sin (Rom 8:20). Since then, all humankind has been born with original sin (Rom 5:12).

    Salvation

    Believers are chosen by God before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:3), justified by the redemption work of Christ (Rom 3:24-25), and born by the Holy Spirit (John 4:3). Believers are saved by grace through faith, apart from their own works (Eph 2:9-10). Believers can have the assurance of salvation (1 John 5:13), and their salvation is eternally secured by the works of Christ (John 10:28-29).

    The Church and Sanctification

    The church is the body of Christ (Eph 4:4) which consists of all who place their faith in Jesus Christ, the Head of the Church (Col 1:18). The mission of the church is to make disciples for Christ in all nations (Matt 28:19) for God’s glory (Eph 3:21). Communion and baptism are the ordinances of the church. All believers are given spiritual gifts for building up the body of Christ (Eph 5:12). All believers have been sanctified positionally (Heb 10:10), are in the process of sanctification (Rom 6:19), and will be glorified in the future (Rom 8:30).

    Last Things

    Christ will physically return to the earth in His second coming to judge all humanity (Rev 19:11; 20:11). All who are not saved will be cast into the lake of fire for eternity (Rev 20:15), and all who are saved will forever live with God in eternity (Rev 21:3-7). Christ will reign the new heaven and new earth in eternity (Rev 11:15).

    Theological Narrative: From creation to New Creation

    God’s Revelation and Scripture

    I believe in general revelation: God is revealing Himself to humankind through His creations.[1] I believe in special revelation: God has revealed Himself through angels, miracles, divine manifestations, words spoken through His prophets, and most importantly, by the Scriptures.[2]

    I believe the entire Christian Bible, all the words in its original manuscript, are God’s inspired words for mankind. The Holy Spirit supernaturally guided the human writers to write down these words. Even though the human writers maintained their own distinctive personalities, literary styles, and were able to express their own views and experience, God ultimately orchestrated the writers’ life to write down the exact words God intended to have on the Scriptures to be preserved as His inspired words.[3] The inspiration of the Scriptures means that the origin of the Scriptures is divine. However, the mode of divine inspiration remains largely a mystery to man.[4]

    I believe that the entire Bible is inerrant. That is, the Scriptures tell the truth and contain no errors.[5] It is because God is the truth. He does not lie. Even though the human writers were fallible, the divine author was able to orchestrate the writing process so that the original manuscripts were without errors. Therefore, I believe the records of the creation, the fall, all the history of Israel and the nations, all the prophecies, all the miracles, all the words and works of Jesus Christ, the teachings on the epistles, and the end-time prophecies are true.

    I believe the Scriptures have the highest and final authority over mankind, especially over each believer individually and overall church authorities.[6] The Scriptures have authority over the tradition of a church. If a church’s tradition is contrary to the Scriptures, the church should submit to the authority of the scripture. While the church’s councils, creeds, and doctrinal statements are helpful and oftentimes essential to summarize and clarify the teachings of the Bible, they are under the authority of the Bible. All bible teachers are under the authority of the scripture. Their job is to handle the scripture rightly.

    I believe in the sufficiency of the Scriptures. The Scriptures contain all the words from God to men necessary for salvation. The Bible is sufficient to bring man into an initial relationship with God, as well as sufficient to provide teachings, encouragement, and nourishment for godly Christian living and ministry.

    I believe all of and only all the 39 books of the Old Testament and 27 books of the New Testament are canonical writings. These books were recognized and received by the early church as the inspired words of God.[7] No new books can be added to the Bible.[8] God inspired Moses to write the Pentateuch[9] , and the OT canon ended with the Malachi. After that, there were no more OT prophets until the birth of Jesus Christ. After the ascension of Jesus, the apostles wrote books or epistles to teach the person and works of Jesus Christ. Twenty-seven books were widely circulated among the early churches[10] and were recognized as the inspired word of God.[11] After the completion of Revelation by apostle John, the NT canon is closed. The prophets and apostles are the foundation of the church,[12] the disappearance of apostles and prophets would mark the end of the canon.[13]

    I believe believers should use all God’s given abilities to read and understand the Scriptures, but ultimately, the Holy Spirit guides us to understand the Scriptures.[14]

    The Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit:

    I believe[15] God exists eternally, for He has no beginning and no end. He reveals His characters through all His names in the Scriptures. Elohim[16] reveals God as Creator-Sustainer of the universe,[17] Adonai[18] reveals God as Lord par excellence, and YHWH[19] reveals God as I am Who I am.[20] God is self-existent, self-sufficient, completely free, coherent, united, perfect, immutable, incomprehensible, outside of time, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and distinct from all creations. These attributes belong to God only.[21] I believe God is glory, true, wise, holy, just, good, faithful, loving, and merciful. He graciously shares these attributes with humans[22]. God is the Divine Source of All,[23] Sovereign Ruler,[24] Holy Judge,[25] Compassionate Reconciler,[26] and to Whom all things return.[27]

    I believe Jesus Christ is God the Son,[28] and He is eternally begotten from God the Father.[29] Christ is not a creature, for, with the Father and the Spirit, He is the Creator of this universe and everything in it. Christ is fully God[30], for He is of one essence with God the Father and equal with the Father in glory. Christ is equal with God the Father but willingly submits Himself to the Father.[31]

    I believe Christ was sent by the Father into this world to redeem humans by dying on the cross. He willingly emptied[32] Himself to become the man, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, by Incarnation.[33] He was incarnated by the Holy Spirit[34] through the virgin Mary, and His human nature would not exist without the Incarnation. His human nature is aware of and sustained by His divine nature.[35] He is fully God and fully man, except He is without original sin.[36] Christ was tempted in every way, but He has lived a life without sins. Christ was completely obedient to God the Father and the perfect human the Father desired. He loved God the Father and has exemplified human existence fully. Christ, in His human nature, obeyed the Holy Spirit; and, in His divine nature, had authority over the Holy Spirit.

    I believe Christ was crucified on the cross, buried, and resurrected on the third day. He has ascended into the heavens and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will return to this world in glory to judge all humans and take all who believed in Him into eternity in glory.[37]

    I believe the Holy Spirit[38] is God[39]. The Spirit is one essence with God the Father and God the Son, [40] yet distinct in person. Therefore, He is worthy of being worshipped. The Holy Spirit is the Creator of the universe together with the Father and the Son. The Holy Spirit worked in Jesus’s life in Incarnation, in baptism, in His daily life, in His teaching and miracles, in His emotion, at the cross, and in the resurrection. The Holy Spirit also works in every stage of the believer’s salvation, life, and ministry. The Spirit works in a person’s justification, sanctification, and glorification.[41] The Spirit was sent by the Father and the Son[42] to indwell in believers to testify[43] Christ Himself.[44]

    I believe God eternally exists in three persons, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. The Son is not the Father, the Son is not the Spirit, and the Spirit is not the Father. However, there is one God, not three[45]. All three persons are perfect in unity, one in essence, equal in glory, distinct in relations, and indwelled in each other.[46]

    Creation, Humanity, and Sin

             I believe that the triune God is the Creator[47] of this universe and all that is in it,[48] which He created out of nothing[49]and shaped in a way that He regards as good through His spoken word and His Son Jesus Christ. Furthermore, I believe that God continues to preserve the existence of this universe through Christ.[50]

    I believe God created unnumerable[51] sinless, powerful,[52] intelligent, spiritual beings[53]  known as angels.[54] They were created to serve and worship God.[55] One of the highest ranked angels,[56] Lucifer,[57] wanted to be worshipped like God. Therefore he turned himself into Satan[58] and led one-third of the angels to rebel against God. These fallen angels became demons. Some were chained under gloomy darkness, and the rest of the demons are serving Satan. All of the demons will be judged by God into the punishment of eternal fire after the millennium and before the creation of the new heavens and new earth.

    I believe that although Satan is highly intelligent and powerful, he is not equal to God. Instead, he is under the authority of God Satan was the serpent that tempted Adam and Eve to fall into sin. Since the fall, Satan continued to work against God’s plan of salvation for humankind. He actively binds the spiritual eyes of unbelievers to prevent them from knowing the gospel. Satan disguises himself as an angel of light to deceive people from knowing the truth. He constantly accuses God’s people before God, entices them to sin, sabotages God’s people’s ministry, and attacks believers. I believe that Satan has been defeated by Christ at the cross, though he has not been judged and executed. Satan will be bound in the bottomless pit when Christ returns to earth for a thousand years. After that, he will be thrown into the lake of fire and will be tormented day and night forever.[59]

             I believe that humankind was the climax of God’s creation because only humankind was created by the triune God in His image and likeness.[60] Humans are created to mirror the Creator and to enjoy a relationship with Him. God’s purpose is so that humankind can represent and reflect the triune God. Therefore, he commanded humans to have children to populate the earth and rule over all His creations[61].

             I believe a human is a complex dichotomy. Humans have both material and immaterial aspects. I believe in traducianism, that is, a person’s material and immaterial aspects are created through the agency of human parents. Gen 2:7 only describes the historical creation of Adam. Since then, humans have procreated according to their own image[62].

             I believe all humans have dignity, regardless of their capabilities, because we are created in the image of God. Therefore, humans should treat each other with respect.[63]

    I believe God instituted marriage as the relationship between a man and a woman to reflect the relationship between Christ and His church. God designed humankind for companionship with others, analogous to the relationship between the three persons of the Trinity.

    I believe the first humankind couple was called Adam and Eve. However, unfortunately, they fall into the temptation of Satan. Consequently, they lost their spiritual life, became dead in the trespasses and sins, and became subject to the power of Satan.

    I believe this spiritual death has been transmitted to everyone except Jesus Christ[64]. As a result, all humankind is born with original sin, with no capacity to reconcile to God apart from the grace of God.[65]

    Salvation

    I believe that salvation is entirely the work of the triune God. All humans are sinners and cannot save themselves from God’s righteous judgment. Therefore, God the Father sent His Son Jesus Christ to become man, die on the cross, and resurrect on the third day to provide salvation for the world.[66]

    I believe Jesus Christ is the only Savior in the world. All the Old Testament prophecies and promises of the Messiah are fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Christ’s death on the cross has fully satisfied the righteous requirements of God once and for all. No further sacrifice for sins is needed. Christ is sinless but has taken on Himself the sins of all humans. Christ’s resurrection proved that He had victory over death and sin.[67]

    I believe in unlimited atonement.[68] Christ died to make possible the salvation of all humans. However, only those who believe are saved[69]. I believe in substitution atonement.[70] That is, Christ died to pay for the penalty of sinners to satisfy the righteousness and holiness of God. I believe humans cannot merit[71] themselves into salvation by doing good works[72] or keeping the church sacraments, including baptism[73] and the Lord’s supper.[74] All humans can only be saved by grace alone,[75] through faith alone,[76] in Christ alone.[77] I believe that the special grace of God is effective.[78] The elects may temporarily resist God’s grace, but ultimately the grace of God will prevail.

    I believe in total depravity, that fallen humans in our natural states are spiritually dead, blinded by Satan,[79] and unable to respond to the gospel. The sovereign and loving God in eternity past predestine some[80] to receive His grace, not according to God’s foreknowledge of the faith or good works of the person[81], but according to His purpose[82] for His glory. Those who are not chosen are left[83] in their self-willed state of sinful rebellion against God, leading to their eternal damnation.

    I believe that the redemption works of Christ are applied to the elects through the Holy Spirit. He calls[84] the elects and works in them to have faith[85] to believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ. Those who repent and believe in the gospel will be born again by the Holy Spirit,[86] united with Christ, justified,[87] and adopted[88] as children of God.[89]

    I believe the Holy Spirit indwells in the believers and works in our life through the means of sanctification to transform us into the image of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, faith must produce fruits.[90] However, believers will not reach perfectness in this life because of their sinful nature. Thus, sanctification is a continuing process until we depart from this world.

    I believe in the perseverance of the saints.[91] Although believers continue to experience struggle with sins in this life due to sinful nature, we can never lose our salvation[92] because the Lord Jesus constantly advocates for us as our high priest. In addition, God the Father has sealed us with His Holy Spirit. I also believe in the assurance of salvation because the Holy Spirit works in the believers’ lives to testify that we are children of God through His word.[93]

    I believe that when believers depart from this world, we will be with Christ immediately in our spirit. And then, believers will be given a glorious body at Christ’s second advent.[94] Believers[95] will spend eternity with God. However, God will judge unbelievers[96] at the great white throne. They will lose their chance to respond to the gospel after they die.[97] They will be thrown into the lake of fire and will suffer for eternity as a consequence of their sins.

    The Church and Sanctification

    I believe in the one universal church, which consists of all people who place their faith in Jesus Christ in all times and all places. Christ is the head of the church, and the church is His body. The church is the bride of Christ and should submit to Christ’s headship.[98] The Lord Jesus Christ has supreme authority in the church. The church began in Pentecost and is distinct from Israel.[99] The Holy Spirit baptizes all who believe in Christ as members of His body.[100] The church includes both Jews and Gentile believers of Christ because they are one in Christ Jesus.[101] I believe a local church[102] is a local assembly of Christians in which the person and work of Jesus Christ is the center of worship.[103]

    I believe that the Lord Jesus Christ has established baptism and the Lord’s Supper[104] as the two ordinances of the church.[105] Biblical baptism is a full-body immersion[106] in the name of the Triune God for the confessing believer.[107] The Lord’s Supper elements represent flesh and blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Nevertheless, He is present uniquely with the believers during the Lord’s Supper.[108] In addition, I believe only baptized believers should partake in the Lord’s Supper.[109]

    I believe in the local church’s autonomy,[110] where each local church should be self-governed[111]. However, it is biblical for local churches to have fellowship, support each other, and work together for the missions of God.[112]

    I believe in the cessation of the office of apostles and prophets.[113] Each local church should be led by a plurality of elders-pastors[114] who are spiritually mature men[115] gifted in teaching.[116] One of these elders-pastors is the lead elder pastor, the primary preacher of the local church.[117] The purpose of the ministry of the elders-pastors is to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ.[118] These elders-pastors are assisted by a group of deacons, who are spiritually mature men and women. The congregation should submit to their leadership under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.[119]

    I believe all believers should associate themselves with a local church where they worship, love, and evangelize together. The Holy Spirit has given all believers spiritual gifts, and all believers should exercise their spiritual gifts to build up the body of Christ.[120] All believers are priests in the church. They are called to serve and worship God and to proclaim God in this fallen world. I believe the ultimate purpose of the church is to glorify God.[121]

    I believe the doctrine of justification by faith through faith is not a license to sin. God commands those who are justified to live a holy life. Believers are in union with Christ in His death and resurrection.[122] This union with Christ gives believers the power to live a holy life in obedience to God. I believe sanctification is the continuing work of the triune God[123] on the life of the believers to conform them into the likeness of Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit, who indwelled in the believers.[124]  I believe all who are born again are instantly justified and sanctified positionally.[125] However, the believers will struggle between the Spirit and the flesh[126] because their sinful nature is still in them, which cannot be completely eradicated in this life. Therefore, perfect sanctification is never attained in this life.[127] Nevertheless, progressive sanctification begins immediately upon conversion when the person is given a new life in Christ.[128]

    I believe sanctification is by grace through faith. The Holy Spirit progressively sanctifies believers.[129] The process of sanctification is accomplished through both corporate and individual means.[130] Believers are to obey[131] the word[132] of God to live a life of increasing holiness.[133] I believe that all believers will be completely sanctified when they depart from this world to be with the Lord Jesus Christ.[134]

    Last Things

    I believe Christ inaugurated the kingdom when He was seated at the right hand of the Father’s throne. Therefore, the kingdom exists in the spiritual realm in the heart of believers in the present dispensation[135]. Therefore, the Church is the present Revelation of the Kingdom.[136]

    I believe that when people die, their bodies will be separated from their spirits, decay, and return to the earth. However, their spirit will continue to have consciousness in this stage.[137] The believers’ spirit will immediately be with Christ in heaven.[138] However, the non-believers’ spirits will be in hades, suffering as a punishment for their sins.[139] These are the intermediate states of the dead until the end times.[140]

    I believe in bodily resurrection for the believers.[141] It is a great hope for believers because the resurrected body is an imperishable, glorious body. At the rapture, all the believers who are dead will resurrect and be reunited with their spirits. Together all the believers alive will be raptured to heaven before the seven years tribulation to meet Christ. The believers will then be judged by Christ, not for eternal destiny, but for eternal rewards according to their works during their lifetime as believers.[142]

             I believe that at the end of the seven years tribulation, Christ will physically return to earth with the saints to destroy the antichrist, the false prophets, and their armies. The antichrist and the false prophets will be thrown into the lake of fire.[143]

    I believe Christ will establish the millennium kingdom on earth after the tribulation.[144] The millennium will be a literal one thousand years kingdom on earth[145] where Christ will rule with the saints.[146] The extent of the saints’ authority and responsibility depends on their faithfulness to the Lord in their life.[147] The millennium will fill with peace, joy, holiness, glory, justice, an abundance of knowledge, absence of sickness, universal worship of God, and full of the presence of God[148] under the reign of the King of kings and Lord of lords.[149]

    I believe Satan will be bounded during the millennium. At the end of the millennium, Satan will be released, and he will deceive the nations[150] to attack the saints. Then, God will send fire from heaven to destroy Satan and his troops. After that, Satan will be thrown into the lake of fire to join the other two members of the false Trinity, the antichrist and the false prophet. They will be tormented day and night forever.[151]

    I believe, after the millennium, all the wicked will be resurrected and judged by Christ at the great white throne judgment according to what they have done in their life.[152] Then, they will be thrown into the lake of fire to suffer for eternity as a just punishment for their sins.[153]

    I believe that God will destroy the present heaven and earth after the millennium. Then God will recreate a new heaven and new earth.[154] The New Jerusalem will come down from the new heaven to the new earth, and it will be the capital city of God in eternity. There will be no more sin, death, and curse on the new earth.[155] This new earth is an actual physical place. What was lost in the fall will be restored to God’s original purpose.[156] The unfallen angles and all people throughout the history of humans who have been saved by God will live with God forever. The redeemed will reign will Christ in the new heaven and the new earth forever.[157]

    Biblical, Exegetical, Theological, Historical, and Explanatory Notes


    [1] Ps 19:1; Rom 1:19-20.

    [2] Nathan D. Holsteen, ed., Exploring Christian Theology: Revelation, Scripture, and the Triune God (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House, 2014), 27.

    [3] 2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:21; 1 Corinthians 7:25. See Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology: An Introduction. (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017), 121.

    [4] Stephen J. Nichols and Eric T. Brandt Ancient Word, Changing World: The Doctrine of Scripture in a Modern Age. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2009), 163.

    [5] Inerrancy does not 1) demand strict adherence to the rules of grammar, 2) exclude the use of either figures of speech or literary genre, 3) demand historical or semantic precision, 4) demand the technical or observational language of modern science, 5) require verbal exactness in the citation of the Old Testament by the New, 6) demand that the sayings of Jesus contain the exact words Jesus uttered but rather a faithful report of His meaning, 7) guarantee the exhaustive comprehensiveness of any single account or of combined accounts where those are involved, 8) demand the infallibility of non-inspired sources used by biblical writers. See Nathan D. Holsteen and Michael J. Svigel, Exploring Christian Theology Volume One: Revelation, Scripture, And the Triune God. (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2014), 48.

    [6] The Romans Catholic church position is the Roman Catholic church has authority over Scripture. A third view is the church and the Bible belong together, as an organic unity of community and text, making it impossible to allow “authority” to the Bible over the church or vice versa. See Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology: An Introduction. (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017), 112.

    [7] A widespread consensus on the New Testament writings appears to have emerged within the churches by the middle of the third century, with lingering low-level disputes over four letters – 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, and Jude. Benjamin Warfield’s list of the low-level dispute letters replaces 2 Peter with Philemon. See Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology: An Introduction. (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017), 111. And Benjamin B. Warfield, The Canon of The New Testament: How and When Formed. (Philadelphia: The American Sunday-School Union, 1892), 9.

    [8] Rev 22:18.

    [9] Deuteronomy 31:24; Joshua 8:30-35. See Nathan D. Holsteen and Michael J. Svigel, Exploring Christian Theology Volume One: Revelation, Scripture, And the Triune God. (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2014), 50.

    [10] 1 Thessalonians 5:27; Colossians 4:16.

    [11] 2 Peter 3:16; 1 Tim 5:18. Early church at apostle time already treated the apostles’ writings have the same authority as the Old Testament canon. The apostle Peter treated many of Paul writings the same other Old Testament Scriptures. Paul had both Deuteronomy and Gospel of Luke under the same category a scripture. 

    [12] Ephesians 2:20.

    [13] Nathan D. Holsteen and Michael J. Svigel, Exploring Christian Theology Volume One: Revelation, Scripture, And the Triune God. (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2014), 53.

    [14] John 14:26; 16:13.

    [15] What I believe is based on God’s revelation in Scriptures, with the help of Creeds, especially the Nicene (325)/Constantinople (381) and Chalcedon (451) creeds. Creeds are important documents that aid to our understanding of the Trinity, because the creeds are consensus of how the church fathers understood the Scriptures.

    [16] אֱלֹהִים, first occurs in Gen 1:1, occurs 2,600 times in 2,248 verses in the OT as noted by Scott Horrell, “The Names of God,” Unpublished Class Notes for ST5102 (Dallas Theological Seminary, 2021), 1.

    [17] Horrell, 1.

    [18] אָדוֹן, first occurs in Gen 15:2, occurs about 449 times, with YHWH 315 times, is found predominantly in the prophets (320 times) as notes by Horrell, 2.

    [19] יהוה, first occurs in Gen 2:4, occurs about 6,877 times in 5,815 verses, not including abbreviations and contractions in the OT as noted by Horrell, 3.

    [20] YHWH is the personal name of God in covenant with creation and especially with Israel. Horrell, 3.

    [21] These are known as incommunicable attributes of God. See Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd ed. (Baker Academic, 2013), 237. Also see Holsteen, Exploring Christian Theology, 145–52.

    [22] These are known as communicable attributes of God. See Erickson, Christian Theology, 2013, 237.

    [23] Gen 1:1; Acts 17:24-29; Rev 4:11. God the father received the designation of fons divinitatis, the ultimate divine source or ground for all created existence. Although God the Son and God the Spirit also involved in the creation, but the Scriptures and church fathers give prominence to God the Father as the ultimate source of all creation. See Scott Horrell, “Father Who Draws Hear,” Unpublished Class Notes for ST5102 (Dallas Theological Seminary, 2021), 15.

    [24] Deut 10:14, 17; 2 Kings 19:15; Dan 4:34-35; 7:10; Matt 11:25; Eph 1:3-5, 11; 1 Tim 6:15; Rev 4:2-5:13. God is the Lord of heaven and earth, He has dominion over all creations.

    [25] God the Father is Holy (Isa 6:3), He is the source and standard for defining right and wrong, and He is the Judge of all creations (Gen 18:25; John 3:36; Rev 4:8, 20:11). Yet, He has given the right to judge all things to God the Son Jesus Christ (John 5:22; 2 Tim 4:1; Rev 6:16-17).

    [26] God is love (1 John 4:8,16), He loves the world (John 3:16), He shows His love for us by sending Christ to die for us (Rom 5:8). God makes us a new creation (2 Cor 5:17) and reconciled us to be His children (Rom 8:15-17; Eph 2:19).

    [27]God the Father is the Alpha and the Omega (rev 1:8; 21:6), so does God the Son (Rev 22:13). All things are subjected to God and the Son (1 Cor 15:27-28). These are the primary roles of God the Father, the Scriptures do contain other metaphors that describe who God is, example God is the husband of Israel (Hos 2:2-16; Jer 3:1-14); the good Shepherd (Ps 23), see Horrell, “Father Who Draws Hear,” 14.

    [28] Matt 26:62-65, 28:19; John 1:1-3, 14, 18; 8:58; 10:30; Col 1:16-19; Heb 1:2-3.

    [29] John 1:14, 18; 3:16.

    [30] Matt 26:64; John 1:1-3; John 1:14, 18; John 10:30; John 20:28-29; Rom 9:5.

    [31] John 17:5; Phil 2:6.

    [32] Phil 2:5-8. What Christ emptied was 1) His glory that He had before the world existed (John 17:5), 2) His authority by submission to the Holy Spirit, 3) His divine power by restraining from exercising it. See Augustus Hopkins Strong, Systematic Theology (Philadelphia, PA: American Baptist Publication Society, 1907), volume 2, 703. Also see Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1993), 373–81.

    [33] John 1:14; Rom 1:3-4; Phil 2:5-8; Col 2:9; 1 John 1:1-4. For a classic works on the theology of Incarnation, see Athanasius and John Behr, On the Incarnation, Popular Patristics Series, no. 44b (Yonkers, N.Y: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011).

    [34] Luke 1:35.

    [35] It is known as enhypostatic (inpersonal). The Athanasian Creed proclaims: “For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man. God of the substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and man of substance of His mother, born in the world.” Quoted from Rick Brannan, Historic Creeds and Confessions (Oak Harbor: Lexham Press, 1997), chap. Athanasian Creed.

    [36] The Chalcedonian Creed is also known as the Definitio Fidei (Faithful Definition). It declares that Christ’s divine nature and human nature exists in one hypostatis (person) of Jesus Christ, without separation, without confusion. Horrell has a table that shows the major Scriptures that show the divine and the human nature of Christ in the NT, see Scott Horrell, “One Person Two Natures,” Unpublished Class Notes for ST5102 (Dallas Theological Seminary, 2021), 1.

    [37]Luke 4:1; John 16:7; Rom 8:16; Col 3:4.

    [38]The Holy Spirit has at least 40 titles. The Spirit shows up in difference names in the OT, all with the Hebrew word ruah (רוּחַ). The Greek word for Spirit is πνεὐμα, there are approximately 275 occurrences of spirit that refer to the Holy Spirit in the NT. The Holy Spirit also occurs with other titles that do not have the word spirit, for example the other Counselor (John 14:16).  Scott Horrell, “Holy Spirit,” Unpublished Class Notes for ST5102 (Dallas Theological Seminary, 2021), 13–15.

    [39]As witnessed by the NT (Matt 12:31-32; Matt 28:19; John 16:13; Acts 5:3-9; 9:31; 2 Cor 3:17-18) and the Nicaea/Constantinople Creed (AD 325/381) and the Athanasian Creed.

    [40]The Scriptures reveals that Holy Spirit has the same divine attributes as God the Father. The Holy Spirit is omniscience (1 Cor 2:10), omnipotence (Isa 40:13-17), omnipresence (Ps 139:7-9), and truth (John 14:17; 15:26).

    [41] Gen 1:2; Ps 33:6; Job 33:4; Luke 1:35; 3:22; Isa 11:2-3; Luke 4:1; Isa 61:1; Luke 4:14; 18-19; Acts 10:38; Luke 10:21; Heb 9:14; Rom 8:2; 1 Cor 12:1-11; John 6:63; Titus 3:5; John 16:12-14; Gal 5:22-23.

    [42]Historically, there is a great debate between the Eastern and the Western Church regarding whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father or from the Father and the Son. It is called the Filioque Controversy. The argument is based on the understanding of John 15:26, “… the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father…”. Both sides interpreted this as a reference to the immanent Trinity, that is the Holy Spirit is eternally proceeds from the Father. The West interpreted that Jesus’s words at John 16:7, “… I will send Him to you.” as the Holy Spirit eternally proceed from the Father and the Son, but the Eastern Church disagreed. Letham claimed that most modern theologians think these verses only refer to the economy Trinity, not necessary the immanent Trinity, which is my current position based on my understanding of John 15:26 and 16:7. See Robert Letham, The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship, Revised and Expanded [edition] (Phillipsburg, New Jersey: P&R Publishing, 2019), chap. 10: East and West: The Filioque Controversy.

    [43]John 15:26-27.

    [44]For a detail works on the person and work of the Holy Spirit, see R. A. Torrey, The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit as Revealed in the Scriptures and in Personal Experience (Fleming H. Revell, 1910).

    [45] John 20:17; 14:16, 26; Deut 6:4; 1 Cor 8:6. See Holsteen, Exploring Christian Theology, 131.

    [46]John 14:9-11; 17:21. This doctrine is known as perichoresis. A doctrine originated from the Eastern church, first taught by Gregory of Nyssa (AD 335-395) and developed by John of Damascus (AD 675-749).

    [47]While there were other creation stories other than the biblical creation story from Mesopotamian in the middle and late bronze age (2100-1200BC), Christians believe that only the biblical creation story is the revelation from God. In other creation stories, the gods are inferior to God of the Bible.

    [48] All Christians agree that God created this universe but have difference views on the creation process. Millard summarized these views into six categories, there are 1) the gap theory, 2) the flood theory or young earth theory, 3) the ideal-time theory, 4) the age-day theory, 5) the pictorial-day theory, and 6) the revelatory-day theory. For more details, please read Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd ed. (Baker Academic, 2013), page 350-352.

    [49]Gen 1:1; Ps 33:9; John 1:1; Rom 4:17; Heb 11:3. We have well preserved writings of early church fathers who believe that God created this universe out of nothing. The Latin speaking church fathers called this doctrine creation ex nihilo.

    [50] Ps 33:9; Heb 11:3; Prov 8:22-31; John 1:1-3; Col 1:17.

    [51]Angels do not get married, which implies they cannot reproduce (Matt 22:30), therefore God must have created all angels directly at one time. God said the angels were there when God created the foundation of the earth (Job 38:7). The number of angels is unknown, we do know that God create a lot of them (Heb 12:22), John saw in a vision that in heaven, the angels are number in thousands of thousands (Rev 5:11).

    [52]Although powerful, angels are not omnipotent. Although they have great knowledge, they are not omniscience. There are spiritual beings, but not divine. They are creatures, not creators. All angels, including the chief of fallen angels Satan are under the authority of God (Job 1:12; 2:6).

    [53]Ps 148:2,5; Col 1:16.

    [54]Bible has many terms that are referred to angels. The Hebrew word for angel is מַלְאָךְ , the Greek equivalent is ἄγγελος. In Old Testament, sons of the Elohim (Job 1:6; 2:1), sons of Elim (Ps 29:1;89:6), holy ones (Ps 89:5,7), watchers (Dan 4:13, 17, 23) are generally thought as angels as well. Collectively, angels are referred to as “the council” (Ps 89:7), “the assembly” (Ps 89:5) or hosts, as in the term the Lord of “hosts”. In New Testament, angels are also referred as heavenly host (Luke 2:13), ministering spirits (Heb 1:14), principalities, authorities, and spiritual forces of evil in heavenly places (Eph 6:12), these are all angels created by God.

    [55]God commissions angels to deliver His messages to humankind, to deliver humankind from danger, or to execute judgement on humankind.

    [56]The Bible did not reveal in details of the ranks of angels. We are told that Michael is an archangel (Jude 9). There are also different types of angels. Many believe that cherubim and seraphim are types of angels, although the Bible does not explicitly state that.

    [57]Lucifer was most probably created between the unknown length period between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. This is the view of Lewis Sperry Chafer. He spent 6 chapters on the second volume of his Systematic Theology on Satanology.  Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology (Kregel Publications, 1993), Volume 2, 39.

    [58]Isa 14:12-17; Eze 28:1-10. Chafer has extensive commentary on the fall of Satan as revealed in Isaiah 14:12-17 and Ezekiel 28:1-10. He exegeted the five “I will” in Isaiah 14 and concluded that each “I will” represents a motive of Satan’s rebellion against God. There are to secure 1) the highest heavenly position; 2) regal rights both in heaven and on earth; 3) Messianic recognition; 4) glory which belongs to God alone; and 5) a likeness to the Most High, the “possessor of heaven and earth”. See Chafer, Systematic Theology, Volume 2, 45-50.

    [59] Jude 6; Eph 6:13; Job 1:6-12; Rev 12:9; 2 Cor 4:4; 2 Cor 11:14; Job 1:9-11; Rev 12:10; 1 Pet 5:8; 1 Thess 2:18; 2 Cor12:7; Rev 20:1; Rev 20:10.

    [60]Humans still carry the image of God after the fall (Gen 5:1; 9:6; Jam 3:9).

    [61] Gen 1:26-31.

    [62] Gen 5:3. See Nathan D. Holsteen, ed., Exploring Christian Theology. Volume II: Creation, Fall, and Salvation (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House, 2015), 35–37.

    [63] Gen 9:6; James 3:8-9. See Holsteen, 37–38.

    [64]Gen 1:26-28; Eph 2:1-2; Rom 5:12.

    [65]The state of the sinfulness of humankind was the hot debate in 4th century and there were three major views. Pelagius (ca. 354-418) believed that all humans are born sinless, spiritually alive, and able to trust and obey God and thus merit eternal life. Augustine of Hippo (354-430) believed that all humans are born sinful, spiritually dead, and unable to trust and obey God apert from the grace of God. John Cassian (ca. 360-435) believed that all humans are born sinful, spiritually sick, but equipped with freewill sufficient to response to God’s outstretched hand. The church 3rd ecumenical council (AD 431, Ephesus) condemned Pelagius (ca. 354-418) but did not endorse either Augustine or Cassian’s view. See Nathan D. Holsteen, ed., Exploring Christian Theology. Volume II: Creation, Fall, and Salvation (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House, 2015).

    [66] I believe the Bible teaches unlimited atonement. Strong Calvinists typically defense limited atonement by defining the word “world” used by John as the “elects.” Jesus, however, distinguished the world from the elects (John 17:9). John did the same (1 John 2:2). Robert Lightner has effectively demonstrated that John Calvin himself did not hold the limited atonement view, see Robert Paul Lightner, The Death Christ Died: A Biblical Case for Unlimited Atonement, Revised Edition (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1998), 13-14,131.

    [67] Acts 4:12; Luke 24:44; John 5:39; John 19:30; Heb 10:10-14; 1 Cor 15:56-57.

    [68]One’s view on the extent of the atonement is mainly affected by his understanding of the intent of the atonement. Strong Calvinists understand that the intent of atonement is to secure salvation, therefore they view that Christ’s atonement is only for the elects (John 10:15; Eph 5:25). The Armenians understand that the intent of atonement is to obtain redemption and sufficient grace for all men, leaving men with the decision to choose or reject the redemption (John 3:16; 2 Cor 5:19; 2 Pet 2:1; 1 John 2:2). I believe the moderate Calvinists’ view best harmonizes two sets of Scriptures. Lighter wrote this about the moderate Calvinists’ position: “Christ died to make possible the salvation of all men and to make certain the salvation of those who believe.“ See Lightner, The Death Christ Died, 46–47.

    [69]  Universalism believes all people will be saved because God is love. The problem with universalism is that it ignores the holiness and righteousness of God (Rom 2:5; Rev 19:11). The Scriptures are clear that some people will spend eternity in hell (Matt 13:42, 50; 23:33; 25:41; 2 Thess 1:9; Rev 20:15; 21:8).

    [70]  Christ’s atonement is multifaced. I believe the Scriptures teaches that penal substitution is the foundation of atonement. Christ died on the cross to satisfy God. Because God is righteous and holy, He must judge sinners; because God is love, God in Christ, incarnate as man, died on the cross as the substitute for sinners. (Isa 53:4-9; Rom 3:23-26; Rom 4:25; 2 Cor 5:21; 1 John 2:2). For an excellent exposition of the substitution view, see John R. W Stott, The Cross of Christ (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2021), 112-164.

    [71] Human religions teach works salvation, but the gospel proclaims salvation by grace alone (Eph 2:8-9).

    [72]Pelagius (d. 418) taught that 1) humans are born without original sins, 2) the grace of God is not required to obtain salvation, and 3) humans have the ability to live a sinless life. See Augustine, A Treatise against Two Letters of the Pelagians, 5.24. Augustine spent tremendous effort to fight against Pelagianism because its teaching is contrary to the doctrine of grace. Pelagianism was condemned by the Synod of Carthage (A.D. 412), Council of Jerusalem (A.D. 413) and Third General Council at Ephesus (A.D. 431), see Louis Berkhof, The History of Christian Doctrines (Grand Rapids, MI: WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1949), 141–42.

    [73] Supporters of “baptism regeneration” often quote Acts 2:38 to support their view. They are confused about the efficient cause and instrumental cause of salvation. The only efficient cause of salvation is the redemption work of Christ. Baptism is an instrumental cause of salvation. Baptism is not necessary for salvation. However, believers should express their faith to Christ by baptism. See Gregg R. Allison, Sojourners and Strangers: The Doctrine of the Church, Foundations of Evangelical Theology Series (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2012), 359.

    [74] The Romans Catholic church teaches that participants of the Lord’s Supper would receive saving grace from God, for they believe the wine and bread turned into the real blood and body of Christ at each Lord’s Supper. Strong responded with 1) Christ was with the disciplines physically, distinct from the bread when He instituted the Lord’s Supper (Matt 26:26), therefore the bread could not be His real body; 2) It contradicts humans’ senses that the wine and bread remain the same; 3) it denies the completeness of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross; 4) it destroys Christianity by externalizing it. See Strong, Systematic Theology, 965–66.

    [75] The doctrine of grace becomes the foundation doctrine of the reformation and is still held on by a large section of the evangelical church. See Carl R. Trueman, Grace Alone: Salvation as a Gift of God, What the Reformers Taught … and Why It Still Matters, The Five Solas Series (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2017).

    [76] Romans Catholics believe that justification is by faith and works. The Scriptures reveal that justification is by faith alone apart from works (Rom 3:25, 28, 30; 5:1; Gal 2:16; Phil 3:9). Faith is the means or instrument, not the ground of justification. The ground of justification is the righteousness of Christ, which is imputed to the sinner who believes. See Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 520–24.

    [77]Old Testaments believers are saved by grace through faith just like New Testaments believers. Abraham believed the LORD, and God counted it to him as righteousness (Gen 15:6; Rom 4:3). Based on the New Testament text (John 14:6; Acts 4:12), I argue that Old Testament believers are also saved in Christ, although they did not have the same knowledge of Christ as New Testament believers do.

    [78] The Bible describes two kinds of grace, common and special grace. Common grace is for all people (Matt 5:45; Acts 14:17), special grace is for the elect (Eph 2:4-5; 1 Pet 1:13). Special grace is effectual. The elect may resist grace temporarily, but not finally. Bruce A. Demarest, The Cross and Salvation: The Doctrine of Salvation, Foundations of Evangelical Theology Series (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2006), 84–85.

    [79]Eph 2:1-3; 2 Cor 4:4.

    [80]God did not choose a class of people, but He chose each individual. The Greek adjective ἐκλεκτός occurred 24 times in NT, 17 times are used as plural to describe the “chosen ones” or “elects” (Matt 24:22; Rom 8:33; Col 3:12; 2 Tim 2:10; Tit 1:1; 1 Pet 1:1). Demarest wrote, and I agree: “The elect are viewed not as an empty class, for in the preceding verse the elect cry out to God, obey Christ, are faithful to him, and reflect the fruits of the Spirit – all of which are activities of individuals, who also may be considered as a group or a class.” Demarest, The Cross and Salvation, 125.

    [81]Paul wrote those God foreknew (προέγνω) He also predestined (Rom 8:29). Προέγνω could mean “know beforehand” or “choose beforehand.” Cranfield wrote that it should be understood in the light of the use of yada in OT passages like Gen 18:19; Jer 1:5, and Amos 3:2. Paul is writing about believers whom God predestined. Based on the context, Morris concluded that chose beforehand is “as good as we can do.” Leon Morris, The Epistle to the Romans, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press, 1988), 332. BDAG agrees, see William Arndt et al., Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 866.

    [82]Eph 1:5.

    [83] Sproul argues that the reform faith teaches double active-passive predestination, which means the predestinations are asymmetrical. The predestination to the elect is active, God takes an active role to move the elect into salvation. The predestination to the none-elect is passive, God takes a passive role to leave the none-elect to their own sinful lifestyle that leads to reprobation. Sproul convincingly listed five reformed confessions to support his view. See R. C. Sproul, “‘Double’ Predestination,” 2012, https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/double-predestination.

    [84]The Bible reveals two kinds of callings, the general calling to all (Isa 45:22; Matt 11:28; 22:1-4; Luke 14:16-24; 2 Cor 5:20), and the special calling to the elects (Luke 14:23; John 6:44; Rom 8:29-31; 1 Cor 1:9, 29; 22-24). See Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd ed. (Baker Academic, 2013), 862.

    [85]The reformed traditional believes faith consists of three ingredients: notitia (knowing), assensus (agreeing), and fiducia (trusting). I believe the traditional reformed view is correct. Faith in Jesus Christ is not then knowing and agreeing, it also includes a commitment to Jesus as Lord (Acts 2:21; 2:36; 16:31; Rom 10:9).

    [86]Reformed theologians believe in monergism, that regeneration is the work of the Holy Spirit alone without the cooperation of men, and regeneration happens before a person believes in Christ logically. Other evangelical theologians, e.g., Erickson and Demarest, also believe in monergism regeneration, place regeneration after a person believes in Christ. For them, the enablement of faith is not regeneration but the special calling of the Holy Spirit, and I agree that this view is most in-line with Scriptures. See Bruce A. Demarest, The Cross and Salvation: The Doctrine of Salvation, Foundations of Evangelical Theology Series (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2006), 290–295. Also see Erickson, Christian Theology, 2013, 864.

    [87]Justification is a judicial event in which a believer is declared righteous by God on the basis that Christ’s righteousness was imputed on him (Rom 3:21-22; 4:5; 5:1). See James K. Beilby and Paul R. Eddy, eds., Justification: Five Views, Spectrum Multiview books (Downers Grove, Ill: IVP Academic, 2011), 89–91.

    [88]John 1:9-13; Rom 8:12-23; Gal 4:4-7; Eph 1:5; 1 John 1:1-3.

    [89]Ordo Salutis of various traditions is different. I believe the order of the Evangelicals in the broadly Reformed tradition as layout by Demarest is most consistent with the overall revelations of Scriptures (Rom 8:28-30; 1 Cor 1:26-30; Eph 1:11-14; 2 Thess 2:13-15; 2 Tim 1:8-10; 1 Pet 1:1-2; 2 Pet 1:9-11). See Demarest, The Cross and Salvation, 36–44.

    [90]However, there are three caveats: 1) a believer is not always fruitful (Tit 3:14; 2 Pet 1:8); 2) a believer’s fruit is out always outwardly evident; 3) each person understanding of fruit is incomplete. See Charles Ryrie, So Great Salvation. (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 1997), 41–42.

    [91]John 6:39; Augustine, A Treatise on the Gift of Perseverance, vol. 5, chaps. 9, “When Perseverance is Granted to a person, He cannot but persevere”.

    [92]Eternal security is clearly taught in these verses: John 5:24; 6:37-40; 10:27-20; John 17:9-24; Rom 4:5-6; Rom 8:29-30; 8:33-39; 11:29; Eph 1:4-5; 1:13-14; 2 Tim 1:12; 2 Tim 4:18; Heb 12:2; Jude 24-25. The Scriptures that Arminians interpreted as a loss of salvation are either 1) describe about a loss of maturity or reward or 2) describing professing believers who were never truly saved from the beginning (2 Peter 2). Those who do not persevere to the end are not true believers (1 John 2:19). See Horton et al., Four Views on Eternal Security, chaps. 3, A Reformed Arminian View, “A moderate Calvinist Response to Stephen M. Ashby”, Hoopla.

    [93]Council of Trent (1545-63) denied that a person could have the assurance of salvation except for a few exceptional saints who have received special revelation from God. Arminians can have assurance at present but cannot have ultimate assurance at the final judgment because believers could lose their salvation by apostasy. However, Peter instructed us to pursuit assurance, and that assurance is grounded on the election (2 Pet 1:10-11).

    [94]Phil 1:23; Phil 3:21.

    [95]I do believe that the babies who died before the age of accountability, which is different for each child and is not known to us, are saved by God through the work of Jesus Christ (2 Sam 12:23; Matt 18:14; 19:14). See John MacArthur, Safe in the Arms of God: Truth from Heaven about the Death of a Child / John MacArthur (Nashville, Tenn: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2003), 90.

    [96]  Inclusivism teaches that those who worship other Gods would be saved by Christ as long as they are sincere in their faith. This view, while comforting, gives false hope to the none-believers because the Bible is clear that knowledge of Christ in the New Testament dispensation is required for salvation. See Gabriel J. Fackre, Ronald H. Nash, and John Sanders, What about Those Who Have Never Heard? Three Views on the Destiny of the Unevangelized (Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press, 1995), 69.

    [97]Some believe none-believers will be given a second chance to respond to the gospel after death. The historical, orthodox, evangelical view is there is no second chance after death (Matt 13:42, 50; 25:46; 2 Thess 1:9; 2 Pet 3:7; Rev 14:11; 20:15).

    [98]Col 1:18; Eph 5:24.

    [99] How one views the relationship between the church and Israel is based on whether he has adopted dispensational or Covenantal theology. Dispensationalism stresses discontinuity between the OT and NT. But covenantal theology stresses continuity. It emphasizes God has one group of people, they are the Israelites in Old Testament time, and the church in New Testament time.

    [100]Acts 1:4-5; 1 Cor 12:13.

    [101] Gal 3:28.

    [102] In Acts, James, 3 John, Revelation, and the earlier Pauline letters, ἐκκλησία always refer to a particular local congregation. In Paul’s letters to Colossians and Ephesians, ἐκκλησία is the spiritual or universal church. See D.W.B. Robinson, “Church” D. R. W. Wood et al., eds., New Bible Dictionary, 3rd ed. (InterVarsity Press, 1996), 200.

    [103] I choose this simple statement as the mark of the church because I think the following marks of the church throughout the history of the can be boiled down to this: “The person and work of Jesus Christ is the center of worship.” As written in the Nicaean-Constantinople Creed, the marks of the early church are one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. The marks of the church in the reformation are the word of God purely preached, and the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Support properly administered.

    [104]Matt 28:19; 1 Cor 11:24.

    [105] All branches of the Christian Church agree that baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of the church, see Nathan D. Holsteen and Michael J. Svigel, eds., Exploring Christian Theology: The Church, Spiritual Growth, and the End Times, vol. 3 (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House Publishers, a division of Baker Publishing Group, 2014), 45.

    [106]Mark 1:10; Acts 8:36-39; Rom 6:1-11. Historically, the church has three modes of baptism, namely immersion, pouring, and sprinkling. However, pouring and sprinkling are developed practices in church history. Immersion is the biblical mode of baptism.

    [107]Some branches of the church, for example, the reformed presbyterian churches, believe in pedobaptism. The main argument is baptism replaces circumcision as the sign for a family with a covenantal relationship with God. However, this logical inference is against the clear teaching of NT about believer’s baptism.

    [108]I reject the Roman Catholic transubstantiation view because Christ has already sacrificed Himself once, and it is forever effective (Heb 10:10-12). I reject the Lutheran view because Christ is not physically present in the elements but is seated at the right hand of God in heaven (Heb 10:12). The Zwinglian memorial view is correct because the Lord said, “do this in remembrance of me” (1 Cor 11:24). However, it is more than that. I believe Christ is spiritually present in a unique way during Lord’s Supper. Therefore, I agree with Calvin’s view. See Allison, Sojourners and Strangers, 365–87.

    [109]This is a safeguard to prevent unbelievers from taking the elements. This is also an incentive for unbaptized believers not to delay in their baptism. The 1st century Christians only allow baptized believers to take the elements as described in Didache 9.5. See Joseph Barber Lightfoot and J. R. Harmer, The Apostolic Fathers (Macmillan and Co., 1891), 232.

    [110]Each seven churches in Revelation are responsible for their own faith, without hints of responsibility of higher authority outside of the local church (Rev 2:1-3:22).

    [111] Episcopalism is not biblical because I believe the Bible teaches that bishops, elders, and pastors refer to the same groups of leaders (Acts 20:17; 28; 1 Pet 5:1-2). Bishop is not a separate office with higher authority over the elders and the congregation across local churches.

    [112]There are many examples of churches working together for the missions of God. For example, the church of Antioch worked together with the church of Jerusalem regarding OT laws observance for gentile believers (Acts 15). Another example is the churches in Galatia, Macedonia, and Achaia that provided financial support the Jerusalem in church (1 Cor 16:1-4; Rom 15:25-28; 2 Cor 8-9).

    [113]The apostles and NT prophets are the foundation of the church (Eph 2:20). Once the foundation is built, these offices cease to exist. Allison argued that historically, no major figures in the church history (Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Wesley, Billy Graham ) called themselves or have been called apostles. And I would add that is true for prophets as well. See Allison, Sojourners and Strangers, 210.

    [114]Elders, pastors, overseers, and bishops refer to the same group of men. Didache teaches the appointment of bishops and deacons without mentioning elders because they refer to the same group of leaders (Didache 15.1). See Lightfoot and Harmer, The Apostolic Fathers, 232.

    [115]1 Cor 14:34-35; 1 Tim 2:12; 3:2; Tit 1:5 exclude women from the office of the elders-pastors.

    [116] 1 Tim 3:1-7; Tit 1:5-9.

    [117] This man is the lead teacher among the elders. Didache 4.1 teaches, “thou shalt remember him that speaketh unto thee the word of God night and day, and shalt honour him as the Lord.” See Lightfoot and Harmer, The Apostolic Fathers, 230.

    [118] Eph 4:11-12.

    [119] 1 Tim 3:8-13; Heb 13:7, 17; 1 Pet 5:4.

    [120]1 Cor 11:18-20; Heb 10:25; Eph 5:12.

    [121]1 Pet 2:5, 9; Matt 5:14-16; 1 Cor 10:31; Eph 3:20-21. The church exists to worship and glorify God. Allison wrote: “worship is the all-encompassing passion and purpose of the church”. See Allison, Sojourners and Strangers, 424.

    [122] Rom 6:3-11; Gal 2:20.

    [123]All three persons of the Godhead, God the Father (1 Thess 5:23), God the Son (Eph 5:26), and God the Holy Spirit (2 Thess 2:13) work in our sanctification.

    [124]Sanctification is a process by which one’s moral condition is brought into conformity with one’s legal status before God. In particular, sanctification is the Holy Spirit’s applying to the life of the believer the work done by Jesus Christ.” See Erickson, Christian Theology, 2013, 898.

    [125]Acts 20:32; 26:18; 1 Cor 1:2; 6:11; Heb 2:11; Heb 10:10, 14.

    [126]My view of Romans chapter 7 is Paul was talking about the struggle of a believer (Rom 7:17).

    [127]Evangelicals in the Reformed circle believe Christians cannot reach a perfect, sinless life, but evangelicals from the holiness circle believe that Christians could.

    [128] 1 Cor 5:17; Gal 6:15; Col 3:10.

    [129] “This growth in godliness is not a result of human effort or works but is a gift of God by grace. This can be described as “cooperation” or “participation””. See Michael Svigel, “Lecture 10, Sanctification” (unpublished class notes for ST5105, Dallas Theological Seminary, Summer Semester, 2021), 14.

    [130]Church history is filled with teaching on the means of sanctification. These means can be categorized into corporate and individual means. Maintaining the balance between extreme corporate and extreme individual means is essential for a healthy Christian life. See Michael J. Svigel, RetroChristianity: Reclaiming the Forgotten Faith (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2012), chap. Chapter 11: From We to Me-Nurturing Personal Christian Identity.

    [131]Believers are to live in obedience to the word of God because we are the Lord’s disciples (Matt 28:20). The word of God has the power of sanctification (John 17:17). Whoever obeys the word will be blessed (Rev 1:3).

    [132]The words sanctify (John 17:17) and the Spirit sanctifies (2 Thess 2:13).

    [133]Believers are being renewed to conform to the image of our creator (Rom 8:29; Gal 5:16; Col 3:10), it is also called to grow up into salvation (2 Peter 2:2).

    [134]All believers will eventually be fully sanctified when they see the Lord Jesus Christ face to face (Rom 8:29-30; Phil 3:21; 1 Thess 5:12-13; 5:23, Jude 24).

    [135] Craig A. Blaising and Darrell L. Bock, Progressive Dispensationalism (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2000), 265.

    [136]Eph 1:20-23; Col 1:13. See Craig A. Blaising and Darrell L. Bock, Progressive Dispensationalism (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2000), 257-262.

    [137] Luke 16:22-31; Luke 23:43; Phil 1:23; 2 Cor 5:8. The “Soul sleep” cannot be supported biblically. The phrase “fallen asleep” (1 Thess 4:13) is a euphemism for death, referring to the body’s outward appearance. See Randy C. Alcorn, Heaven (Wheaton, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2004), 46–47.

    [138] 1 Cor 5:6-8; Phil 1:21-24.

    [139] Luke 16:19-31; Rev 20:13. See Chafer, Systematic Theology, v4.413-414.

    [140] What I mean “the end times” is all the events beginning with the Rapture all the way to eternity.

    [141] It is supported by the OT (Isa 26:19; Dan 12:2), the NT (1 Thess 4:14-18; John 5:25-29), the apostles and the Nicaea-Constantinople creeds, the reformers like Calvin, and the Confessions like Westminster. On the other hand, the heterodox view that resurrection is only spiritual without physical resurrection is influent by Gnosticism, inconsistent with the Bible and classic Christianity. See Svigel, “ST5106 Course Notes Unit 03b,” 142–43.

    [142] 1 Cor 15:42-44; 1 Thess 4:14-18; Rom 14:10-12; 1 Cor 3:11-15; 2 Cor 5:9-11; Rev 19:11-21. See Mark Hitchcock, The End: A Complete Overview of Bible Prophecy and the End of Days (Carol Stream, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2012), 47.

    [143] Rev 19:11-21.

    [144] Hitchcock developed a very helpful acronym, PREMIL, for the six reasons why the Premillennial view is a better view than the amillennial view and the postmillennial view. PREMIL stands for 1) Promises of God; 2) Resurrection in Rev 20:4-6; 3) Earliest view; 4) Most Natural Reading of Rev 20:1-6; 5) Imprisonment of Satan; 6) Literal Use of Numbers in Revelation. See Hitchcock, The End, 409–15.

    [145] Historically, the premillennial view is more aligned with the early church fathers’ view. Didache, Barnabas, Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, (See Eusebius Epistle of Barnabas 15.4-9; 3.39.12; Justin Dialogue with Trypho 80; Irenaeus Against Heresies 5.30.4) and the majority of the ante-Nicene fathers (attested by Philip Schaff, as mentioned in Svigel, “ST5106 Eternal State Powerpoint,” 192) held the premillennial view.

    [146] Dan 7:18, 22, 27; 2 Tim 2:11; Jud 1:14; Rev 2:26-28; Rev 19:14; Rev 20:4-6.

    [147] Luke 19:11-26. See Hitchcock, The End, 419.

    [148] For details of the flourish conditions of the millennial, see Hitchcock, 424–28.

    [149] Isa 2:14- 4:2-6; 9:1-7; 11:1-12; 25:6-8; 32:1-4; 32:15-18; 35:1-10; 42:1-9; 60:1-22; 61:1-62:12; 65:17-25; Jer 30:1-22; 31:31-40; Ezek 36:22-36; Dan 7:14, 27; Amos 9:11-15; Zech 14:6-21; Rev 20:1-6.

    [150] Rev 20:3. These are the people who will be born and raised during the Millennium but would not believe in Christ. See Hitchcock, The End, 432–33.

    [151] Rev 20:7-10.

    [152] John 5:22; 2 Tim 4:1; Rev 20:11; Rev 20:11-14. See Hitchcock, The End, 439.

    [153] There are a few heterodox views, namely purgatory, conditional immortality, and annihilationism. The proponents of conditional immortality and annihilationism failed to see that OT passages like Isa 66:24 and Dan 12:2 portray unbelievers would face eternal suffering as a just punishment for their sins. Furthermore, intertestamental Jewish literature continued these OT teachings. In NT, Christ and His disciplines also teach eternal judgment (Matt 25:46; Rev 14:9-11; 20:10). Additionally, the eternity of damnation had a broad consensus in the church’s history. See Lexham Survey of Theology (Lexham Press, 2018), sec. The Judgment of the Wicked.

    [154] I think the recreation is a better view than the renew or redeem view because 1) it is a more natural reading of “passed away” (21:1, 4); 2) Other NT Scriptures seem to indicate the present world will be destroyed (Matt 24:35; Mark 13:31; Luke 16:17; 21:33); 3) 2 Pet 3:10 and Rev 20:11 explicitly state this destruction is literal and physical.  

    [155] Rev 21:4.

    [156] There are incredible parallel between Gen 1-2 and Rev 21-22. See Alcorn, Heaven, 82–82.

    [157] Rev 22:5.

  • Personal Eschatology

    Personal Eschatology

                In this paper, I will respond to a friend’s question related to the biblical teachings of life after death for Christians. First, I will answer with my view on personal eschatology, then support it with biblical, theological, and historical arguments. Next, I will differentiate my view from heterodox opinions about life after death. Finally, I will then argue the orthodox view of resurrection is the resurrection of the body.

                Biblically, when a believer dies, his body will be separated from his spirit. His body will decay and return to the earth, but his spirit will immediately be with Christ in heaven (1 Cor 5:6-8; Phil 1:21-24). When Christ returns to the earth in His second coming, the believer’s body will be resurrected and reunited with his spirit (1 Thes 4:14-18). The believer will then be judged by Christ, not for eternal destiny, but eternal rewards according to his works during his lifetime as a believer (1 Cor 3:11-15; 2 Cor 5:9-11). He will then reign with Christ starting in the millennium and continue to the new heaven and new earth (2 Tim 2:11; Rev 20:4-6).

                However, you must beware of heterodox views like purgatory, conditional immortality, and annihilationism. The Romans Catholic doctrine of purgatory teaches that believers who died with imperfection will undergo purification to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven. However, this heterodox doctrine is based on incorrect interpretations of 1 Cor 3:15 and 1 Pet 1:7[1].

                Conditional immortality teaches human souls will cease to exist after death, but believers will receive immortality from God as a gift. This heterodox teaching is based on the wrong interpretation of Gen 3:19; Eccl 9:5, 10[2]. Annihilationism teaches that the souls of unbelievers will be annihilated after death with temporary or no suffering[3]. They argued that the language of destruction and imagery of fire imply annihilation.

                The proponents of conditional immortality and annihilationism failed to see that OT passages like Isa 66:24 and Dan 12:2 portray unbelievers would face eternal suffering as a just punishment for their sins. Furthermore, intertestamental Jewish literature continued these OT teachings. In NT, Christ and His disciplines also teach eternal judgment (Matt 25:46; Rev 14:9-11; 20:10). Additionally, the eternity of damnation had a broad consensus in the church’s history[4]. The heterodox proponents judge the classical orthodox view of God’s goodness and justice by the moral standards of depraved humans. Additionally, those who grow tired of life would consider annihilation a blessing instead of a judgment of sins.

                The orthodox view of resurrection is bodily resurrection. It is supported by the OT (Isa 26:19; Dan 12:2), the NT (1 Thes 4:14-18; John 5:25-29), the apostles and the Nicaea-Constantinople creeds, the reformers like Calvin, and the Confessions like Westminster[5]. On the other hand, the heterodox view that resurrection is only spiritual without physical resurrection is influent by Gnosticism[6], inconsistent with the Bible and classic Christianity. Therefore, the bodily resurrection gives great hope to believers because the resurrected body is an imperishable, glorious body (1 Cor 15:42-44).

                In conclusion, I have discussed my view on personal eschatology and have given biblical, theological, and historical support for it. Then, I discussed a few heterodox views and gave reasons for their errors. Finally, I argued that bodily resurrection is the orthodox view.


    [1] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd Ed, 1030.

    [2] Michael Svigel, “ST5106 Course Notes Unit 03b” (Dallas, TX, 2022), 140.

    [3] Proponents include Seventh-Day Adventists, John Stott, Clark Pinnock, Edward Fudge, see Svigel, 140–41.

    [4] Lexham Survey of Theology (Lexham Press, 2018), sec. The Judgment of the Wicked.

    [5] Nathan D. Holsteen and Michael J. Svigel, eds., Exploring Christian Theology: The Church, Spiritual Growth, and the End Times, vol. 3 (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2014), 221–22.

    [6] Svigel, “ST5106 Course Notes Unit 03b,” 142–43.

  • Orthodox Eschatology

    Orthodox Eschatology

                This paper will address the topic of the boundaries of orthodox eschatology and argue that the three essential orthodox doctrines are 1) Christ’s literal return to the earth; 2) the bodily resurrection of all the dead; and 3) the final judgment of all people[1]. In addition, Christians should allow room for diverse views on the details of end-time topics, including 1) the millennium, 2) the rapture, 3) the tribulation period, and 4) the transition to the new heaven and new earth. Finally, I will conclude with the implications on this thesis on the Christian life.

                The three doctrines are essential orthodox doctrines because they are the plain teachings from the scriptures, attested by the apostolic church fathers, confirmed by the creeds, and held by all major works of systematic theology since the Reformation. Matt 24:27, 30, 44; 25:31; John 14:3; Acts 1:11; 10:42; 17:31; 1 Thes 4:16-17; Tit 2:13; and Rev 1:7; 22:12 together clearly testify that Christ will physically return to the earth to judge all people who will be resurrected from death. Additionally, Didache[2], Polycarp[3], Justin Martyr[4], and Irenaeus[5] attest to these essential orthodox doctrines. Furthermore, the Apostles, Nicene, and Athanasian creeds also attest to these three orthodox doctrines. Finally, reformer Calvin[6], Reformed theologian Berkhof[7], dispensational theologian Chafer[8], Methodist theologian Miley[9] and Pentecostal theologian Duffield and Van Cleave[10] all attest to these orthodox doctrines in their systematic theology.

                However, there were multiple views on the details of the end times. First, there are three views of the millennium: the premillennial, amillennial, and postmillennial. Second, there are three views on the rapture: the pre-tribulation, mid-tribulation, and post-tribulation views. Third, there are four views of the timing of the tribulation period: the preterist, the historicist, the idealist, and the futurist views[11]. Fourth, there are two views on the transition to the new heaven and new earth: the ex nihilo (2 Pet 3:10)[12] and the regeneration[13] views (Rom 8:18-25; Rev 21:1-5).

                On the one hand, if a Christian does not have a clear understanding of the essential doctrines, he will not be able to distinguish a cult from orthodox Christianity. But, on the other hand, if a Christian does not understand he should allow room for diversity of views on the details of end-time, he will be intolerant of other views, or worse, would attack others who hold different views as non-biblical or even as cults.

                In conclusion, I have argued that Christians should know the three essential orthodox doctrines and allow room for diversity of views on the details of the end time. I have provided biblical, historical, and theological support for the orthodox doctrines and the implication of this thesis on the Christian life.


    [1] Mark Hitchcock, The End (Carol Stream, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2012), XIV.

    [2] Didache 16:1-8.

    [3] Polycarp to the Philippians 2:1-18.

    [4] Justin Martyr, Dialogue of Justin with Trypho, Chapters 80-81.

    [5] Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 5.2.3; 5.19.2.

    [6] John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, trans. Henry Beveridge (Edinburgh: 1845), XVI.17.

    [7] Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 353.

    [8] Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1993), 4.367.

    [9] John Miley, Systematic Theology, Volume 2 (Hunt & Eaton, 1893), 444–45.

    [10] Guy P. Duffield, Foundations of Pentecostal Theology (L.I.F.E. Bible College, 1983), 520–34.

    [11] Hitchcock, The End, 38–48.

    [12] Hitchcock, 447–59.

    [13] Michael Svigel, “ST5106 Course Notes Unit 03b” (unpublished class notes for ST5106, Dallas, TX, 2022), 146–156. Jerome, Augustine, Gregory the Great, and Thomas Aquinas held this view. See Randy C. Alcorn, Heaven (Wheaton, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2004), 155.

  • 认识天父的心意(以弗所书1:15-24)

    认识天父的心意(以弗所书1:15-24)

    地点:德州丰盛恩友堂

    开始

             亲爱丰盛恩友堂的弟兄姊妹主内平安。我的名字叫Ken杨全荣。在马来西亚华生长。现在达拉斯神学院进修,在科林郡恩友堂聚会和学习服事主。我感谢主给我有机会与弟兄姊妹分享神的话。也谢谢吴牧师愿意冒风险,给我有机会服事。我是一个极骄傲的人。在年轻的时候只信自己,否认神的存在。但主没有放弃我,祂不断地寻找我,二十多年前把我带到美国,在这里听见福音,蒙恩得救。信主之后,我就开始参与教会的服事。在服事过程中,有时会遇见难处。在跟随主的道路里,不但在教会里有难处,在人生里,也遇见难处。有些难处使我觉得很非常软弱,有些难处大到我几乎没有能力跟谁主和服事主。

    你呢?我相信,你跟随主也曾经遇见许多的艰难。可能你现在就正在经历一个难处。你的难处可能是你所爱的亲人离开世界了,你活在悲伤里,没有能力向前走。你的难处可能是要与疾病争战,你的身体有软弱,你没有能力向前走。你可能是因为在教会里服侍遇见难处,和同工不合,或者没有被教会重视,你觉得对教会灰心,你觉得灵里软弱,没有能力向前走。你可能面对经济的压力,一方面你要养家,一方面你要为孩子预备大学的费用,一方面你要为自己的退休打算,你心里疲惫,没有能力向前走。你可能正在与罪争战,有一个罪你一直不能胜过,你觉得自己很软弱,没有能力胜过这个罪。在跟随主的道路上,当我们有软弱的的时候,如何能够从新得力呢?

             我今天要与弟兄姊妹分享的题目是认识天父的心意。信息的主要思想是认识天父的心意能够帮助你从软弱中重新得力。认识天父的心意能够帮助你从软弱中重新得力。我们今天的经文是以弗所书一15-23。以弗所书一15-23是一个祷告。使徒保罗在以弗所书里有两个祷告,这是第一个祷告。从以弗所书一15-23里,我们学习认识天父的心意的三件事。

             我们开始前先有一个祷告。慈爱的天父,谢谢你爱我们,把主耶稣赐给我们,使我们成为你的儿女。我们求你安静我们的心,让我们来到你的施恩宝座前,聆听你的话语。我们在跟随主的路上遇见许多的难处,许多的压力,许多的失望,许多的无助,我们需要你的话语来鼓励我们。求你将把那赐人智慧和启示的灵赏给我们,使我们真知道你的心意。好让我们在软弱中能够重新得力跟随主耶稣。奉耶稣基督得胜的名祷告,阿门。

             我为何知道以弗所书一15-23是一个祷告呢?请看一章第15和16节。 因此,我既听见你们信从主耶稣,亲爱众圣徒,就为你们不住地感谢 神。祷告的时候,常提到你们保罗因以弗所的弟兄姊妹对主耶稣的信心和对众圣徒的爱心而感谢神。他常在祷告中纪念他们。在今天的经文里,保罗把他祷告的内容总结起来,写给以弗所的弟兄姊妹。所以17节到23节是保罗的祷告的主要内容。

    认识天父的心意必须倚靠圣灵(1:15-18a)

             今天信息的主要思想是认识天父的心意能够帮助你从软弱中重新得力。我们会学习三个重点。第一个重点是认识天父的心意必须倚靠圣灵。认识天父的心意必须倚靠圣灵。请看第十七节求我们主耶稣基督的 神,荣耀的父,将那赐人智慧和启示的灵赏给你们,使你们真知道他”。这里保罗祈求的对象是天父。感谢神,祂是愿意听祷告的天父。保罗特别形容天父是荣耀的,荣耀是神所有属性的总结。天父是荣耀的,祂的心意也是荣耀的。保罗向天父求的是将那赐智慧和启示的灵赏给以弗所的弟兄姊妹。这个灵是指内住在我们里面的圣灵。保罗在一章13节已经提过信了耶稣的人就受了所应许的圣灵为印记。所以保罗不是求天父赐圣灵给以弗所的圣徒,因为他们已经有了圣灵的内住。保罗求的是圣灵能够启示天父的心意给他们,保罗求的是圣灵赐智慧给他们,使他们能够真知道天父的心意。

             圣灵如一间房间里的一盏灯。一间没有窗的房间是漆黑的,我们需要开灯才能看见。祷告就如开灯。所以圣灵的功用需要用祷告去支取。亲爱的弟兄姊妹,在你软弱时你有没有祷告?在你软弱时,你的人就如黑暗的房间,你看不见盼望。你需要开灯,你需要祷告。许多基督徒喜欢查经,讨论神的话,但是却很少人愿意在祷告中仰望圣灵的启示。你要真知道天父的心意吗?你必须祷告,依靠圣灵的启示。

             圣灵启示我们将会发生什么事呢?我们心中的眼睛将会被照亮。基督徒有两双眼睛。长在我们头上外面的肉眼,和长在我们心中里面的属灵的眼睛。肉身的眼睛对肉身的脚步有很大的影响,照样,心灵的眼睛对于我们属灵的道路也有很大的影响。

             但是我们心里的眼睛常常是瞎的。属灵的事,必须依靠圣灵才能晓得。保罗在哥林多前书二章9到10节里告诉哥林多的弟兄姊妹,“如经上所记: 神为爱他的人所预备的 是眼睛未曾看见, 耳朵未曾听见, 人心也未曾想到的。只有 神借着圣灵向我们显明了,因为圣灵参透万事,就是 神深奥的事也参透了。”(林前2:9-10)。

    Fanny Crosby是十九世纪的美国姊妹。她两个月大就因生病后被医生用错药而眼睛瞎了。虽然她的肉眼是瞎,她心里的眼睛却是明亮的。她一生服事主,写了超过九千诗歌。比如“十字架,十字架,永是我的荣耀“。比如”这是我信息 我的诗歌,赞美我救主 昼夜唱和。这是我信息 我的诗歌,赞美我救主 昼夜唱和“。有一次,一位苏格兰牧师告诉她,神没有给她视力太可惜了。 她的回答让他大吃一惊:“如果我在出生时有选择权,我会要求失明……因为当我到达天堂时,我看到的第一张脸将是为我而死的主。” 天父在Fanny  Crosby肉体的软弱里,显出祂的大能。

    亲爱的弟兄姊妹,当你面对孩子的悖逆时,你需要圣灵照明你心中的眼睛。当你遇见服事的压力时,你需要圣灵照明你心中的眼睛。当你因生活的忙碌,对属灵的事已经麻木时,你需要圣灵照明你心中的眼睛。你心中的眼睛是瞎眼的,还是明亮的?如果你只是用你的肉看看事情,你就只能见地上的事,而看不见天上的事。如果你只是用你的肉看看事情,你就只会看见物质的世界,而看不见属灵的世界。所以你需要求天父赐你智慧与启示的灵,使你真知道祂。

    天父的心意是何等的浩大(1:18b-21)

             第一个重点是认识天父的心意必须倚靠圣灵。当圣灵照明我们心里的眼睛时,我们会看见什么呢?我们会看见天父的心意是何等的浩大。这是今天信息的第二个重点是,天父的心意是何等的浩大。为什么我这样说呢?因为十八和十九节有三个何等。并且照明你们心中的眼睛,使你们知道他的恩召有何等指望,他在圣徒中得的基业有何等丰盛的荣耀;并知道他向我们这信的人所显的能力是何等浩大。“

    第一个何等

    第一个何等是天父对我们的恩召有何等的指望。这里的他是指天父。天父呼召你和我,就是天父的恩典临到我们这些不配的罪人身上。这是以弗所书一章前半段所讲的真理。有何等的盼望是指天父赐给祂所召的人有许多的应许。这些盼望充满在圣经里。保罗以弗所书一章3节说,父神在基督里把天上各样属灵的福气都赐给我们。

    我有一段很长的时间是住在佛州奥兰多。几个月前,我收到一个消息。那位在奥兰多教会带领我的前辈,他是教会的牧者,非常爱主。他的其中一个儿子,是我曾经在教会里服事的青年人,今年已经三十一岁,从医学院毕业,在医院实习。他刚刚结婚,新娘子也是医生,人很漂亮,他们是一对很优秀,又爱主的夫妻。他的家人和教会都为他喜乐。但是结婚第三日,他就生病,24小时之内,他就被主接回天家了。这个事情太突然了,而且白头人送黑头人,这是人生最悲哀的事。这位带领我的长辈最近分享他的见证,如果不是天父所应许的盼望,他几乎站立不住。但因为天父的应许,他有盼望将来能够在天家与所爱儿子重逢。他在软弱中因看见盼望,能够重新得力。

    亲爱的弟兄姊妹,你知道天父对你的恩召有何等的指望吗?当你或者家人面对死亡的时候,你的盼望是天父应许你有永生。当你面对疾病的时候,你的盼望是天父应许将来会得到永不朽坏,荣耀的身体。当你被仇敌试探犯罪了,仇敌不断地控告你的时候,你的盼望是当天父应许所有在基督里的都不定罪了。但你看见自己有许多不完全的时候,你的盼望是天父应许你将来在祂面前要成为圣洁,无有瑕疵。在基督里的盼望,使你能够面对人生一切的难处。在基督里的盼望,使你能够面对人生一切的挑战。在基督里的盼望,使你能够在软弱的时候,重新得力。在基督里的盼望,提醒你一切的难处都是短暂的。

    第二个何等

    第二个何等是天父在圣徒中所得的基业有何等丰盛的荣耀。基业就是产业的意思。这里不是说天父是我们的产业,而是说我们是天父的产业。这是旧约已经有的概念。被耶和华拯救的以色列人是神的产业。申命记四章20节说:“耶和华将你们从埃及领出来,脱离铁炉,要特作自己产业的子民,像今日一样。”申命记三十二章9节说:”耶和华的分本是他的百姓;他的产业本是雅各。” 我们是天父的基业表示我们是属于天父的。保罗形容这个基业,是荣耀的,而且是丰盛的荣耀。这是什么的概念?我们这样卑微的人,既然成为神丰盛荣耀的基业。我们自己是没有荣耀的,因我们只是泥土所造的。但是天父要把我们这些泥土所造的人,磨成祂儿子基督的形象。这是何等大的恩典。

    大富翁的产业是地产,是股票,是企业。但是天父的产业是你和我。从万物中,神拣选我们作祂的产业。这是表示我们所受的恩典是何等的大,这是表示我们在天父的眼中是得等的宝贝。

    亲爱的弟兄姊妹,你可能在公司里受委屈,但天父说:“不要伤心,你是我荣耀的产业”。你可能在教会里不被重视,或者侍奉没有被认同,天父说:“不要灰心,你是我荣耀的产业。“你可能觉得自己没有什么特别,你可能觉得自己很普通,你可能觉得自己没有什么价值“,但天父说:“不要自卑,你是我荣耀的产业。”

    第三个何等

    第三个何等是天父向我们这信的人所显的能力是何等浩大。请看第19节。“并知道他向我们这信的人所显的能力是何等浩大”。天父要在信祂儿子的人的身上显出祂的大能。这是怎么样的大能呢?请看第20节:就是照他在基督身上所运行的大能大力,使他从死里复活,叫他在天上坐在自己的右边,”这是胜过死亡的大能,能使人出死入生的大能,是全宇宙最大的大能。亚当犯罪把死亡带入世界。但神的大能,使主耶稣死里复活,战胜了死亡的权势。大能的希腊文是dynamis,英文的dynamite,就是炸药,是从这个字来。表示神能力何等浩大。

    刚才我提到我多年住在佛州奥兰多。住在那里有一个好处,就是NASA Kennedy Space Center很近。NASA火箭发射站离我们家只有一个小时。我们有许多机会在近距离看火箭发射。你们有谁看过火箭发射?你猜火箭发射是白天还是夜晚好看?是在夜晚好看。如果你在电影里看火箭发射觉得非常震撼,在现场会比在电影院震撼一百倍。我看过SpaceX Falcon Heavy的发射。Falcon Heavy的火箭大概有六万磅,但它的燃料大概一百二十万磅。当火箭的燃料燃烧的时候力量可以超越地心引力,把火箭离地升天。如果你是在晚上看的话,你会看见整个原本漆黑的天空,会变成白色。然后有一个极大的火球,出地上升天。那是一个极壮观的场面。因为火箭的燃料有极大的能力。但是神使基督死里复活的能力,比火箭的能力还要大无数倍。火箭的能力能够使火箭脱离地心引力。而天父使基督死里复活的大能能够使你胜过人生里一切的难处。使你在软弱中能够重新得力。

    你可能正在与疾病争战很疲惫,但不要伤心,因天父的心意是要使基督死里复活的大能彰显在你身上。你可能正在面对婚姻里不可挽回的危机,但不要放弃,因天父的心意是要使基督死里复活的大能彰显在你身上。你可能面对服事的压力,但不要担忧,因天父的心意是要使基督死里复活的大能彰显在你身上。你可能被罪辖制,但不要灰心,因天父的心意是要使基督死里复活的大能彰显在你身上。

    这大能不但是使基督死里复活的大能,这大能也是使基督坐在神宝座右边,使基督超越万有的大能。请看第20节的下半段和第21节。“就是照他在基督身上所运行的大能大力,使他从死里复活,叫他在天上坐在自己的右边,远超过一切执政的、掌权的、有能的、主治的,和一切有名的;不但是今世的,连来世的也都超过了。” 这些一切执政的、掌权的、有能的、主治的是指地上和天上一切的权势,包括撒旦黑暗的权势。因六章12节说:“因我们并不是与属血气的争战,乃是与那些执政的、掌权的、管辖这幽暗世界的,以及天空属灵气的恶魔争战。” 天父把掌管一切的权柄都赐给基督。基督的权柄超过一切,,一切,一切!一切掌权的,人也好,天使也好,魔鬼也好。一切的创造物,都伏在基督的权柄下。不但是这个世代,而且还是以后的时代,直到永远! 基督都得胜,基督都掌权。

    十二年前,神给我有机会去中国广州有一点的服事。那时我在一个小聚会点服事,有人信住了,我们把他们带到广州荣桂里受洗。荣桂里是广州市的一条街,那里有一个教会,是老传道人林献羔老弟兄带领的教会。广州的弟兄姊妹都称乎林献羔为林伯。他是主耶稣忠心的仆人,为了主被关在监牢里二十多年。他出监牢后,主大大的使用他,成为主的见证人。容桂里的教会是在一个简单的三层高的楼房聚会。那晚聚集了几百位弟兄姊妹,有 80多位弟兄姊妹一起受洗的。他们一起见证主福音的大能,要救一切相信的。因知道中国的教会在过去经历了许多的逼迫,当我看见那个场景的时候,我心里充满了对神的敬拜和赞美。仇敌不断地拦阻神在地上的工作。但是神的大能大力,远超过魔鬼的能力。

    亲爱的弟兄姊妹,你可能正在面对建堂巨大的挑战,不要忧虑,神说:“我要彰显我使基督超越万有的大能大力在你的身上!”你可能正在仇敌的攻击,不要惧怕,神说:“我要彰显我使基督超越万有的大能大力在你的身上!”你可能正在面对感情的问题,但不要气馁,神说:“我要彰显我使基督超越万有的大能大力在你的身上!”

    天父的心意是要彰显基督(1:22-23)

    神要把祂浩大的能力彰显在我们这些卑微的人身上,是为了什么目的呢?天父的目的是要彰显基督。这是今天信息的第三个重点,天父的心意是要彰显基督。请看第22和23节:又将万有服在他的脚下,使他为教会作万有之首。教会是他的身体,是那充满万有者所充满的。”这是引用诗篇八章6节的话。-“你派他管理你手所造的, 使万物,就是一切的牛羊、 田野的兽、空中的鸟、海里的鱼, 凡经行海道的,都服在他的脚下。” 神吩咐亚当要做的,亚当被撒旦迷惑了,失败了。但感谢神,人失败,神不会失败。亚当失败了,但是基督成功了!天父的心意,是要基督作万有之首,这件事要从教会里先开始。这里特别提到教会,表示教会在天父的心意里的重要性。这里说基督作教会的头,如以弗所书五章一样。基督作头不只是各人的事,更是整个教会的事。教会如是一个巨人,头在天上,身体在地上。

    亲爱的弟兄姊妹,你的行为是显出主耶稣是头,还是你是头?外人来到教会里,他们就会看见基督是头吗?很多时候你在服事有难处,是因为你要作头。当你依靠神的大能,愿意谦卑自己,让基督作头,许多服事的难处就会过去。

    基督是头,教会是基督的身体。所以教会并非礼拜堂,也非社会团体,不是华人同乡会,教会乃是基督属灵的身体。主已复活升了天,主自己不在地上,世人如何认识主耶稣呢?就是要通过主的身体,祂的教会,我们。主耶稣拯救你之后,没有立刻把你带到天上去。把你留在地上,就是要让全地的人看见教会就如同看见基督。所以教会非彰显基督不可。天父要显出祂的大能在你的身上的目是要彰显基督。

    如果你的手不听你的指挥,你会是正常的人吗?如果你的脚不听你指挥,你要去东,你的脚要去西,你会变成什么样的人?天父要把祂的能力彰显在你的身上,目的是要你凡事顺服基督,在这个弯曲悖谬的世代,彰显教会是基督的身体。

    天父的心意是要彰显祂的儿子耶稣基督。祂要基督的丰富充满着教会。请看第23节。“教会是他的身体,是那充满万有者所充满的。天父的心意,就是要基督充满着教会。天父要基督的美丽充满着教会。天父要基督的智慧充满着教会。天父要基督的温柔充满着教会。天父要基督的能力充满着教会。天父要基督的荣耀充满着教会。教会如气球。空气充满气球,气球才有功用。天父今天的工作,就是要显出祂的大能大力在我们身上,渐渐地把我们磨成基督的形象,让基督的丰富充满着教会,使教会发出功用。

    结束

    今天信息的主要思想是认识天父的心意能够帮助你从软弱中重新得力。今天我们学到三个重点。第一,认识天父的心意必须倚靠圣灵。第二,天父的心意是何等的浩大。第三,天父的心意是要彰显基督。

    我前面分享我跟随主时遇见许多的难处。有许多时候我软弱到几乎站不起来。但是主没有放弃我。当我在软弱中呼求主的时候,圣灵打开我心里的眼睛,使我在软弱中看见和经历天父的大能。主在我这软弱的人身上,显出他的大能。在软弱中,我靠着主的大能,使我从新得力的跟随祂,侍奉祂。

    听了这个信息,你需要做什么回应呢?你可能因为家里的难处而觉得软弱。你可能因教会的服事而觉得软弱。你可能因工作的事而觉得软弱。你可能因面对仇敌的试探而觉得软弱。当你觉得你没有能力继续走跟随主时,你需要来到天父面前。你需要求天父把赐人智慧与启示的灵赏给你,使你能够认识天父的心意。因为认识天父的心意能够帮助你从软弱中重新得力。在你的软弱中,天父要彰显祂的大能,就是是使基督死里复活的大能大力。天父的大能能够胜过你面对的一切难处。天父要在你的身上作工,把你磨成基督的形象,因为祂的心意是要彰显基督在每一个基督徒身上,使基督的丰富,充满着教会。

  • Don’t Grab (Genesis 25:19-34)

    Don’t Grab (Genesis 25:19-34)

    Preached on 2022-7-13 at DTS by Ken Yeo.

    Introduction

    (Put on headscarf)

    My grandpa came from a foreign land, why did he come? Because Yahweh spoke to him. Yahweh promised He will make grandpa’s descendants a nation, give them a land, and the entire world will be blessed through grandpa. When dad was 40 years old, he married mom. However, mom was barren. So dad prayed to Yahweh. After twenty years, finally, Yahweh answered dad’s prayer and mom was pregnant with me.

    However, there was a problem, I was not alone in her womb, I had a brother, a twin brother. We fight violently inside mom’s womb. Mom could not stand it, so she prayed to Yahweh, and Yahweh told mom something incredible, “Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you shall be divided; the one shall be stronger than the other, the older shall serve the younger.” But, I was not aware it at that time, because I was just a baby in mom’s womb. Therefore I tried to grab my brother’s heel so I could come out first. However I lost the race. Because my brother was stronger, he came out first. He was the firstborn. He had the bekora, the birthright.

    My name is Yacov, my parents gave me this name because I am a heel grabber. And my brother name is Esav, because he is a hairy man. Since our births, I have been trying to grab my brother’s heel, because I want his bekora, the birthright.

    (Take off headscarf)

    You and I are like Jacob. Instead of grabbing for bekora, We grab for name recognition among siblings in our family, we grab for praise and name recognition in seminary, we grab for name recognition in ministry, we grab for name recognition in social media. Sometimes through the grabbing process, we hurt our friends, we hurt our wife, we hurt our children, we hurt our coworkers, we hurt our parents. Is there anything we can do to avoid putting ourselves in these situations? Does the bible reveal to us God’s solution to Jacob’s problem as a grabber? The answer is yes. When we carefully read through the story of Jacob in Genesis, we will conclude that the solution to Jacob’s grabbing problem is to live by faith in God. This is confirmed by the author of Hebrews because he put Jacob in the list of the hall of faith in Hebrews 11. In Jacob’s life, we see that he started with little or no faith in God. But God loves Jacob. He relentlessly used the circumstances in Jacob’s life to build his faith slowly but surely.

    Today, we will look at Genesis 25:19-34 to see three reasons why we should live by faith instead of by flesh based on the beginning of Jacob’s life. We will see that the lack of faith to God in Jacob’s life is the source of his problems. Again, we will look at Genesis 25:19-34, the origin of the Jacob’s story. Genesis 25:19-34 talks about three events. First the birth, second the family issues, and third the sells of bekora, the birthright.

    Because we are chosen by God (25:17-25)

    The first reason we should live by faith not by flesh is because we are chosen by God. Verse 23 tells us that God has chosen the older shall serve the younger. This verse is quoted by Paul in Romans 9:12. Paul’s commentary on this verse is this, “though they (Esau and Jacob) had not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad, in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of He who calls”. God has chosen Jacob before he was born, apart of his works, before he did anything good or bad. This is the key verse to understand Jacob’s life. Because God has chosen Jacob, God will work in Jacob’s life to build Jacob’s faith towards God. No matter how bad Jacob’s situations become, God was always there behind the scenes, leading Jacob’s to grow his faith towards God.

    We are like Jacob, chosen before the foundation of the earth, for salvation and for the fulfillment of God’s purpose, so that God will be glorified in us and through us. You may be facing a tough situation in life right now. Maybe your money is tight. Maybe you have a relationship issue with your girlfriend or wife. Maybe you are dealing with a very difficult person at ministry or at work. Maybe you are not sure how you can study and serve and raise a family at the same time. No matter what is the problem you are facing right now, God is working behind the scenes because you have been chosen by God. Else you would not be seating here today. Therefore, don’t try to handle the situation with your flesh. Trust God, trust His promises to you that are written in His words, trust that God is sovereign, He is faithful, He is all-powerful, and He is working in your life to accomplish His purposes.

    We have looked at first reason why you should live by faith not by flesh. It is because you have been chosen by God. The second reason you should live by faith not by flesh is because life is full of trails.

    Because life is full of trials (25:27-28)

    Look at verse 27-28 with me. “When the boys grew up, Esau was a skillful hunter, a man of the field, while Jacob was a quiet man, dwelling in tents. Isaac loved Esau because he ate of his game, but Rebekah loved Jacob.”

    Growing up, Jacob probably knew God’s has chosen him to carry out God’s covenant with Abraham and Isaac. However his father loved his elder brother Esau, not him. Jacob would be wondering when will Isaac ever transfer the birthright to him? Will God’s word come true? Imagine the kind of conflicts this cause to Jacob’s family. The conflict between Isaac and Rebekah. The sibling’s rivalry between Esau and Jacob.

    You and I are like Jacob. We are chosen by God. God has promised us eternal life in Christ. But God never promised a life without trials. Instead it is the opposite. The Lord Jesus told us “in the world you will have tribulation” (John 16:33). 1) Some trials are just there because we are living in a fallen world. 2) Some trials are there because Satan is attacking us. 3) Some trials are there because you are the victim of sins of other people in your life.

    I don’t need to convince you because you know that. Some of you are going through trials right now. 1) Maybe you are being hurt by someone you loved because of his words or actions. 2) Maybe you are not getting the recognition or appreciation for your hard work at home, at work, at seminary or at ministry. 3) Maybe you are having a conflict with your wife, or your parents, or your siblings, or your children, or your coworkers because they misunderstood your words or motives.

    How do you respond to trials in life? 1) Do you grow in bitterness to the person who hurt you, or do you live by faith by praying to God for the capacity to forgive and love the person? 2) Do you take the matter with your own hands to work for recognition and appreciation, or do you live by faith by bringing the matter to God and be content with God’s recognition for your faithfulness? 3) Do you respond to conflict with arguments and anger, or do you live by faith by responding with patience and love to others?

    We have looked at two reasons we should live by faith not by flesh. First, because we are chosen by God. Second, because life is full of trials. Now, let’s look at the third reason.

    Because we want to avoid the consequences of sins (25:29-34)

    The third reason we should live by faith not by flesh is because we want to avoid the consequences of sins. Let’s look at verse 29-34 with me.

    Once when Jacob was cooking stew, Esau came in from the field, and he was exhausted. And Esau said to Jacob, “Let me eat some of that red stew, for I am exhausted!” (Therefore his name was called Edom.) Jacob said, “Sell me your birthright now.” Esau said, “I am about to die; of what use is a birthright to me?” Jacob said, “Swear to me now.” So he swore to him and sold his birthright to Jacob. Then Jacob gave Esau bread and lentil stew, and he ate and drank and rose and went his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright.” (Gen 25:29-34)

    In this story, we see two negative examples of living by faith. Esau and Jacob are great role models if you want to live by flesh. Jacob took advantage of his brother weakness to obtain the birthright. He wanted the birthright and he wanted it now. “Sell me your birthright now.” “Swear to me now.” He could not wait for God’s timing.

    How about you? Maybe you desire a certain ministry result. Maybe you desire to get an internship. Maybe you desire to get a wife. Are you willing to live by faith to trust God in His timing, or do you live by your flesh to grab what you want, now?

    Jacob was a person who was willing to sacrifice his relationship with others to grab what he wants. He was willing to get ahead or get protection at the expense of others, including his family.

    One time I had an opportunity to lead a group of Chinese Christians to Israel for a study trip. Since that was my first trip as a group leader, I wanted to do well. So I told my wife to seat at the back of the 60 seats tour bus to make it easier for me to work with the tour guide to explain the biblical land while we were on the tour bus. The problem is the tour guide was a rather attractive Jews lady. You could imagine the hurt I have inflicted to my wife. The sad thing was, I did not even know I hurt her at that time because I was blinded by my desire to do well in ministry. I was grabbing for my bekora, at the expense of my wife. My wife was upset with me for a while. By the grace of God we finally reconciled. If I would have asked my wife to seat next to me on the bus, and trust that God would take care of the ministry, I would have avoided the consequence of my sin.

    How about you? What is your bekora? 1) Are you getting great grades at the expense of quality time with your wife? 2) Are you getting ahead in your ministry at the expense others? What are you grabbing?

    Esau is the reverse. He despised his bekora. He sold his bekora for a cup of red bean soap. Hebrews chapter 12 verse 16 warn us not to be like Esau, because he is immoral, unholy, godless, worldly. How about you? 1) Are you selling your testimony as the disciple of Jesus Christ for worldly gain? 2) Are you selling your spiritual blessings for a cup of red bean soup?

    Jacob had to face the consequence of his sins in his life because he did not live by faith in God’s promise. You will face the consequence of sins too if you live by flesh instead of by faith in Christ.

    Is there hope for Jacob? Yes! When we read the rest of his story, we see that God never give up on Jacob. The reason is, God has chosen Jacob before his birth. Jacob’s story is an amazing redemption story of God. God relentlessly worked in Jacob’s life in spite of his lack of faith. God patiently worked in Jacob to grow his faith, so that eventually Jacob would become Israel, the father of the nation chosen by God to reveal His redemption plan and ultimately from Israel came the Messiah, our Lord Jesus Christ.

    Like Jacob, you too have hope because have also been chosen by God. No matter what kind of problems you get yourself into in life, God will never give up on you. He will relentlessly work in your life to mold you into the image of His Son our Lord Jesus Christ. Because those He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, and those whom He predestined He also called, and those whom He called He also justified, and those whom He justified, He also glorified.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, we need to live by faith instead of by flesh because we have been chosen by God, because life is full of trials, and because we want to avoid the consequence of sins.

    (Put on headscarf)

    My name is Yacov, I am now 147 years-old. I will die soon in Egypt, but I trust Yahweh is going to bring my body, and my people, into the promised land.

  • Minister Failure is Ministry Failure (Mark 9:14-29)

    Minister Failure is Ministry Failure (Mark 9:14-29)

    Preached on 2022-7-6 at Dallas Theological Seminary.

    Introduction

    I like you to think of a minister who had failed in his ministry and is well known in the Christian community. I will give you some profiles as examples. A world-famous apologist who believed in his own ability to convince the audience but had a secret perverted sexual lifestyle. A megachurch pastor who believed in his own ability to draw large crowds but had an abusive, authoritarian, bullying lifestyle towards his coworkers and the church members. Do you have a name in your mind yet? Good. You do not have to tell me who he is. Each of you might have different names in your mind because, sadly, there is no lack of ministers who failed in their moral conduct in today’s church. You can verify that with a simple google search for “pastor misconduct.” I am sure none of us want our name to appear in this google search. What can we do to avoid moral failures as a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ? As I was doing the research, I noticed a pattern. They were successful in the past, and their success seems to contribute to their failure.

    My subject for today is, “Ministry failure is doing ministry by believing in ourselves instead of believing in Christ.” Or, to say it in another way, “Ministry failure is doing ministry by trusting in ourselves instead of trusting in Christ.” The text I was assigned is Mark 9:14-50. Due to time constraints, I will be focusing on Mark 9:14-29 only. This is the story of the disciples failing to cast out an evil spirit from a boy. My devotion has three parts, the problem, the solution, and the application.

    Problem: Disciples experienced failure in ministry because they believed in themselves instead of in Christ (9:14-19a).

    What is the problem in this passage? To see the problem, we need to see the bigger picture of the book of Mark. In Mark chapter 6, verse 7, Christ has called the twelve, given them authority over the unclean spirits, and sent them out for ministry. And then we are told in verse 13 that they cast out many demons. Fast forward to chapter 9, after Peter, John, and James saw Christ’s transfiguration, they came down from the mountain. Mark wrote in verse 14, “And when they came to the disciples, they saw a great crowd around them, and scribes arguing with them. And immediately all the crowd, when they saw Him, were greatly amazed and ran up to Him and greeted Him. And He asked them, “What are you arguing about with them?” And someone from the crowd answered Him, “Teacher, I brought my son to you, for He has a spirit that makes him mute. And whenever it seizes him, it throws him down, and he foams and grinds his teeth and becomes rigid. So, I asked your disciples to cast it out, and they were not able.” And He answered them, “O faithless generation, how long am I to be with you? How long am I to bear with you? Bring him to me.”

    The disciples failed to cast out a demon in a boy and ended up arguing with the scribe, and the crowds were watching. Similar situations can be seen today. Pastors’ moral failure has caused arguments among Christians and non-believers on Television and social media. What kind of image is the church portraying to the watching world?

    The rest of the story is mostly about the interaction between Jesus and the boy’s father. This is the pattern of the gospels; the Lord oftentimes uses His interaction with other people to teach the disciple what it means to follow Him and be a true disciple of Jesus Christ. Brothers, can you relate yourself to the disciples? Have you had ministry failure in the past, and the Lord taught you a spiritual lesson through other people in your life?

    Most commentators agree that “O faithless generation” was Jesus’s rebuke towards the disciples. Their previous success in casting out unclean spirits has caused them to have faith in their own experience and ability instead of faith in Christ.

    Brothers, we are getting some of the best education in DTS, and some of you have years of ministry experience and success. However, as your knowledge and experiences increase, you will face greater and greater temptation to believe in yourselves instead of believing in Christ in ministry. If you ignore this problem, your pride will continue to grow, and you might end up in the result of a google search of “pastor misconduct.” The worst thing that can happen to you as a minister is not that you failed to grow the size of the ministry that you serve. The worst thing that can happen to you as a minister is failing to grow your trust in the Lord in ministry.

    Solution: Jesus used the opportunity to teach the disciples to believe in Him instead of in themselves (9:19b-29).

    So, what is the solution? Let’s continue to read the text. Verse 19, after Jesus rebuked the disciples, he instructed them, “Bring him to me.” And they brought the boy to him. And when the spirit saw him, immediately it convulsed the boy, and he fell on the ground and rolled about, foaming at the mouth. And Jesus asked his father, “How long has this been happening to him?” And he said, “From childhood. And it has often cast him into fire and into water, to destroy him. But if you can do anything, have compassion on us and help us.” And Jesus said to him, “ ‘If you can’! All things are possible for one who believes.” Immediately the father of the child cried out and said, “I believe; help my unbelief!”

    After Jesus rebuked the disciples, He instructed them to bring the child to Him. Brothers, we need to bring our challenges to the Lord. This will become harder as we gain more experience because we think we can do ministry with our own strength.

    When the spirit attacked the boy again, the father asked the Lord to help his son, although he was not sure Jesus had the ability to help him. Interestingly, Jesus said it is possible for one who believes. Brothers, I think the Lord is teaching us to believe He is all-powerful but also trust Him with the result because He is sovereign. We need to ask Christ for help and also ask that His will be done in our ministry.

    Then the father replied that he believed, but he was also honest in asking Jesus to help with his unbelief. Brothers, we as seminarians and ministers are very good at hiding our doubts in ministry. We do not need to hide our weaknesses from the Lord. On the contrary, we need to be real with Jesus. Jesus can handle our doubts. We need to frequently examine ourselves and ask the Lord to help us with our witnesses.

    Application: Cultivate a lifestyle of believing in Christ for ministry through prayers.

    We talk about the problem and the solution and let’s talk about the application. Let’s read the remaining of this passage. Verse 25 to 29 reads, “And when Jesus saw that a crowd came running together, he rebuked the unclean spirit, saying to it, “You mute and deaf spirit, I command you, come out of him and never enter him again.” And after crying out and convulsing him terribly, it came out, and the boy was like a corpse, so that most of them said, “He is dead.” But Jesus took him by the hand and lifted him up, and he arose. And when he had entered the house, his disciples asked him privately, “Why could we not cast it out?” And he said to them, “This kind cannot be driven out by anything but prayer.”

    Since most of us will not face demon-possessed situations, how do we apply this text in ministry? I think the application of this text to ministers of the gospel is we should not serve the Lord by believing in our own ability. Instead, we should believe in Him. Ministry failure does not happen overnight. It is a result of a lifestyle of trusting in ourselves. Therefore you need to cultivate a lifestyle of trusting the Lord starting from now.

    Doing ministry by believing in our own ability is like running a marathon with illegal drugs as your energy drink. You will be disqualified. Doing ministry by believing in Christ is like running a marathon with the official sanctioned energy drink. Chris is our God-sanctioned energy drink. Disciples are called to live by faith in Christ, not faith in ourselves, “My righteous one shall live by faith” (Heb 10:38). “Without faith, it is impossible to please God” (Heb 11:6).

    A lifestyle of dependency on Christ is cultivated and manifested in prayers, therefore don’t sacrifice your prayer life for seminary and ministry. I urge you can examine your prayer life right now. What is your attitude when you pray? Do you pray out of routine, or do you pray because you truly feel you do not have the ability to write the paper or serve in ministry without Christ? Do you just go through the motion of prayers, or are you honest with God? Do you bring your doubts to Christ, or do you hide from Him? Why don’t you spend some time tonight to pray about what is one thing you can improve in your prayer life to help you to depend more on Christ instead of yourselves in ministry? Maybe you already pray a lot. Maybe you don’t need to pray more, but you need to pray more sincerely.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, my proposition is, “Ministry failure is doing ministry by believing in ourselves instead of believing in Jesus.” We have looked at the problem, the solution, and the application. The problem is as we continue to increase in our knowledge and experience in ministry, we will experience more and more temptation to trust in our own ability instead of trusting in Christ in ministry. The solution is to bring your ministry challenge to Christ, believe Christ is all-powerful but trust the result to Him, and be real to Christ by bringing your doubts and weaknesses to Him. The application is to examine your current prayer lifestyle and ask the Lord to reveal one area where you can improve in your prayer life to help you to depend more on Christ in ministry.

    No matter how hard we try, we will inevitably experience some failures in ministry, but Christ will never give up on us. He will turn every one of your failures into opportunities to teach you to trust in Him. When the disciples could not cast out the demon, Christ came down from the mountain to look for them. It is Christ who took the initiative to tell the disciples to bring the demon-possessed child to Him. On the surface, the Lord was teaching the father, but what the Lord was doing was teaching the disciples who were watching. The Lord desires the disciples to trust in Him by telling them they need to pray. Brothers, none of us want our name to show up in a google search of pastor misconduct. Let’s cultivate a lifestyle of believing in the Lord instead of ourselves in ministry so that Christ will be glorified through our life and ministry.

  • No sacrifice is too great for Christ (Mark 1:1-20)

    No sacrifice is too great for Christ (Mark 1:1-20)

    Introduction

    In Feb 1885, seven young men in their twenties, known as the Cambridge Seven, set sail from England to China to join Judson Taylor as missionaries to the Chinese. The group leader is C.T. Studd, a very successful cricket player from a wealthy family. He sacrificed the fame of the sport to serve Christ. When he was in China, his dad died in London. He gave away all the inheritance from his father to support the Christian works of George Muller and DL Moody, except for 3400 pounds which he kept for his newlywed wife. His wife asked him, “what did the Lord tell the rich man to do?” He answered, “sell all”. The couple proceed to give the rest of the money after for the Lord’s work. Studd sacrificed his wealth to Christ. After ten years of ministry with a lot of hardship, Studd became very sick and had to return back to England. He sacrificed his health for Christ. However, when Studd heard about the need of the gospel in India, for the second time he set sail from England to Southern India to preach the gospel and pastor a church. After six years of ministry in very harsh conditions in India, once again C.T. Studd became very sick and had to return back to England. Studd sacrificed his fame, his wealth, and his health for Christ. Many of his family and friends think he has sacrificed too much for his faith.

    Have you ever wondered whether it is worth sacrificing your time, money, and energy to prepare yourself to serve Christ? Have you ever wanted to give up seminary and ministry to do something else when money is tight? Maybe you are holding on to something that God wants you to sacrifice for Christ? Today, I want to exhort you with this truth: No sacrifice is too great for Christ. Again, no sacrifice is too great for Christ. Our text is Mark 1:1-20. Again, our text is Mark 1:1-20. We will look at three reasons why no sacrifice is too great for Christ.

    Because it is our greatest honor to serve Christ

    No sacrifice is too great for Christ. The number one reason is that it is our greatest honor to serve Christ. I get this principle from the life of John the Baptist. Please look at Mark 1:1-8 with me. John the Baptist was called by God to prepare the way for Christ. The call was prophesied by the prophet Isaiah 700 years ago: “Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight”. John the Baptist was from a priestly family, but he gave up his predictable and comfortable life in response to God’s calling to prepare the way for Christ. Instead of living in the comfort of a house, he lived in the wilderness. Instead of wearing comfortable cloth, he was wearing coarse cloth made with camel hair. Instead of eating a regular Jewish diet with bread, fish and lamb, his food was locusts and wild honey.

    Did John think he has sacrificed too much for Christ? No! Instead, John the Baptist felt it was his greatest honor to sacrifice for Christ. How do I know this? In Jesus’s time, untying the straps of sandals is one of the lowliest works any person can do. However, John proclaimed he is not worthy to even untie the strap of the sandal for Christ. It is like the president of the United States has come to a beggar on the roadside in Dallas and call him to sacrifice everything he has to serve him. It will be the greatest honor for the beggar to do so. The president does not need his service, but he has chosen the beggar to serve him. Brothers, each of us has sacrificed a lot to come to seminary. We have sacrificed worldly pursuits to serve Christ. We have put many hours into our studies while our friends are enjoying life. When ministry and life get tough, you may be tempted to think your sacrifice is too much. Brothers, never give up your call to serve Christ. We need to realize that you and I are like John the Baptist, unworthy to even tie the shoe strap of Christ. But God, by His grace, has called us to serve Christ. Therefore, no sacrifice is too great for Christ. It is our greatest honor to serve Christ.

    Because we should follow Christ

    The second reason no sacrifice is too great for Christ is that we should follow Christ. Look at verses 9 to 15 with me. Jesus of Nazareth has come to the Jordan River to be baptized by John. When Jesus came up from the water. He immediately saw the heavens opening and the Holy Spirit descending on Him like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved Son, with you I am well pleased.” Mark introduced Jesus as the Son of God in verse 1. But now, suddenly Mark mentioned Jesus as Jesus of Nazareth of Galilee. Why do you think Mark emphasized Nazareth of Galilee? I think Mark wanted to tell us that Jesus came from Nazareth, a real place in Galilee. Jesus is not in heaven with the Father. He is on earth, incarnated as a man. Christ humbles Himself to come down on this earth in obedience to the Father. Christ has sacrificed His glory to serve God the Father.

    Christ’s sacrifice can be further observed in the temptation He faced from Satan while He was in the wilderness for forty days. Jesus could have killed Satan simply by speaking His word. But He voluntarily restricted His own power. Jesus even needed the angels to minister to Him. Our Lord has exemplified a sacrificial life to serve God the Father. Many commentators agree that Mark 10:45 is the key verse of the book. It read “For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

    After John the Baptist was arrested, Jesus came to Galilee to preach the Gospel of God. We are called to be like Christ. Jesus has called each of you to follow Him, just like Jesus has called the disciples to follow Him. To follow Christ is to be like Him. Christ has sacrificed His glory to serve God the Father. If we want to be like Christ, we should be willing to sacrifice anything to serve Christ.

    When I served the Lord in Guangzhou, China 10 years ago, I took the opportunity to visit Samuel Lamb. Who is Samuel Lamb? He is one of the Chinese home church leaders, a preacher of the Gospel, and a faithful servant of God. Because of his faith in Jesus Christ, he was imprisoned for over 20 years! Take a guess at what did he do with his life after he was released from prison in 1979 at the age of 54? He started a home church again. Thousands of Christians flocked to worship Christ weekly at the church. Samuel Lamb was willing to sacrifice all he had for God, following the footsteps of our Lord Jesus Christ. Brothers, I like you to examine your heart right now. Is there anything you know you should sacrifice to follow Christ but have not done so? Maybe it is a habit or hobby that is affecting your relationship with Christ and your witness for Christ. Maybe you watch too many movies and waste too much time on social media when you are supposed to develop your characters for Christ. Are you willing to take a step of faith to make the sacrifice to be more like Christ?

    Because Christ will turn our sacrifice into something greater than we could imagine now

    The third reason why no sacrifice is too great for Christ is that Christ will turn our sacrifice into something greater than we could ever imagine. Look at Mark 1:16-20 with me. After Christ preached the Gospel of God in Galilee, He started to call four fishermen to follow Him. He saw Simon Peter and his brother Andrew casting a net in the sea of Galilee. So, Jesus called them, “Follow me, I will make you fishers of men.” Simon and Andrew immediately left their net and followed Christ. After that, Jesus called James and John, who were mending nets in their boat. Both responded by leaving their Father, Zebedee, in the boat with the hired servants and following Christ.

    Fishermen are the middle class in Israel at that time. We are told John, and James’ family had servants who worked for them. So, their life can’t be too bad. They thought their future was set. They were going to be fishermen. But their life was changed upside down when Jesus called them to follow Him. James and John left their father to follow Jesus. They sacrificed their comfortable and predictable middle-class life to follow Jesus into a challenging and unpredictable life. But Christ promised He would change them from fishermen into fishers of men! How did they turn out? Did Jesus keep His promise? When we look at the rest of the New Testament and church history, we know Christ was faithful to His promise. All four of them became leaders of the early church. They became preachers of the Gospel. Many people were saved through their ministry. Peter became the leader of the twelve and one of the greatest evangelists ever. John wrote five New Testament books. Andrew preached the Gospel in Russia. James died in Jerusalem to witness Christ. All of them lived extraordinary lives as fishers of men.

    A few of us were involved in Cru or Campus Crusade for Christ. The ministry was started by Bill Bright and his wife, Vonette in 1951. They signed a contract with God to sacrifice everything they had to follow Christ. 72 years later. Cru had ministries in almost all the countries in the world, and millions of people became followers of Jesus Christ through this ministry. Christ has turned Bill and Vonette Bright’s sacrifice into something far greater than they could have imagined in 1951. Brothers, when you are feeling pressure from your studies and ministry, don’t give up. When you are discouraged because of criticism from others, or a bad grade, or financial issues, or tiredness, don’t give up, press on! No sacrifice is too great for Christ because Christ will turn your sacrifice into something greater than anything you could imagine today.

    Conclusion 

    After serving in China and India for a total of 16 years, many of CT Studd family and friends told him he had done enough for his faith and should spend the remaining of his life in England. He refused to listen to their advice, for Christ. When he heard about the great need for the Gospel in Africa, once again left the comfortable life in England and went to serve the Lord in central Africa for the next 20 years. He endured much hardship during those years and died there at age 71. C.T. Studd sacrificed his fame, fortune, and life for Christ. He and others laid the foundation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in China, India, and Africa. He once wrote: “If Jesus is God and He died for me, then no sacrifice can be too great for me to make for Him.” “Only one life, it will soon pass; only what is done for Christ will last.” He inspired thousands of men and women to sacrifice their life for Christ. Brothers, no sacrifice is too great for Christ because it is our greatest honor to serve Christ, because we should follow Christ, and because Christ will turn our sacrifice into something greater than anything we could ever imagine today. I urge you to examine yourself today, to see what else you need to sacrifice, for our Lord Jesus Christ.

  • Reflection on The Life of Jonathan Edwards

    Reflection on The Life of Jonathan Edwards

    Introduction

    Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) is one of the most well-known theologians and pastors in New England in the history of North America. He was a puritan pastor, a theologian, a missionary to the Indians, and president of Princeton University. This brief paper will discuss his passion, God-given abilities, and circumstances that made him one of the central figures of the First Great Awakening (1726-1760).

    The passion of Jonathan Edwards

    Edwards was a man with a single focused passion, that is, to wholly devote his life to God[1]. All his life’s endeavors, including his education, family, and ministries, were driven by this one passion.

    Edwards’ passion for the Lord started at a young age. He was the only son of eleven siblings. His father, Timothy Edwards, was a pastor at East Windsor for sixty-one years. Timothy was a Harvard graduate with an extensive library at his home. He was a strict puritan pastor and a great preacher, and his preaching had caused revival at the East Windsor church. His passion for the Lord has a significant impact on his son. Jonathan Edwards’ passion for the Lord was apparent even at a young age[2]. For example, he built a prayer booth in a remote swamp and frequently prayed there before thirteen.[3] When he was a student at Yale, he often wandered in the fields, woods, and hills and repeatedly saw the glory and beauty of God’s love in Christ.

    Edwards was driven by a dedication to principles and set a high standard to live a wholly devoted Christian life. He was willing to pay the price once he was convinced on a principle and was famous for having 70 life resolutions that he read once a week.[4]

    His passion for God could be seen in his passion for having a pure church, where only the regenerated could be a church member. Therefore, he attempted to stop the halfway covenant practice started by his grandfather, Solomon Stoddard, which allowed children of unregenerated church members to be baptized. He also wanted to restrict communion to only communicant church members, who could witness their conversion experience.

    His passion for God can be seen in his missionary effort to the Mohican and Mohawk Indians. After he was dismissed from being the pastor at Northampton, he had a few options but chose to go west to preach the gospel to the Indians and lived in a rural area. However, when the Indians were attacking many towns in New England, Edwards chose to stay at Stockbridge to continue ministering to the Indians. One time, he even sent his ten-year-old son Jonathan Edwards Jr. to accompany a missionary to go into the wilds of the upper Susquehanna Valley to evangelize to the Indians during the French and Indian war.[5]

    God-given abilities of Jonathan Edwards

    Edwards was known as one of the greatest theologians ever in America. He was gifted in three areas. First, he had a brilliant mind that allowed him to think critically and logically on theological concepts and life. Second, he was gifted with the ability to express his thought in writing. Third, he was a gifted preacher.

    Edwards was a gifted theologian. He was a thinker. JI Parker wrote: “His theology of revival is the most important single contribution Edwards has to make to evangelical thinking today.”[6] His theological works made a lasting impact on the theology of the colonies and all the way to the 21st century.[7]

    Edwards was not only gifted with a powerful logical mind but was also a gifted and prolific writer. He thought with his pen and left many writings that have a tremendous impact on the church in America and the world. Edwards had an amazing ability to collect and organize a large amount of information on various topics over thirty years of ministry. He organized these writings in eight volumes of books called the Miscellanies. Writing is learning for Edwards. He was known to write his thoughts on pieces of clothes on horse rides and pin them on his coat, and organize them when he returned home.

    Lastly, Edwards was a gifted preacher. He was meticulous in crafting sermons for maximum impact on the audience. His sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” is one of the most well-known sermons in the church’s history. His preaching resulted in the revival at Northampton and the churches along the Connecticut River in 1735-1737. Together with George Whitefield, the revival spread to the rest of the colonies in the First Great Awakening in 1740-1742. He crafted his sermons with his target audience in mind to help them see God’s glory. Therefore his preaching was effective to regular people, pastors, and even American Indians.

    Circumstances of Jonathan Edwards

    For someone to be an influential figure in the church’s history, it is not sufficient to have a strong passion and spiritual gifts. He would also need the right circumstances to exercise his passion and gifts. Many circumstances in Edwards’s life enable him to be one of the prominent figures in the First Great Awakening.

    First, Edwards’s family background has shaped him to be a devoted Christian since he was a boy. His father, Timothy Edwards, was a pastor trained in Harvard College, wanted to train Jonathan as a preacher. Therefore, Jonathan received excellent training in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin since he was a boy, and he was able to enter Yale College at twelve years old. Second, Timothy was very serious in his sermons. He was a captivating preacher, and his sermons were designed to persuade. Jonathan Edwards learned from his father how to preach.

    Furthermore, Jonathan’s grandfather, Solomon Stoddard, was one of the most respected preachers in New England. He was the pastor of the second largest church in Massachusetts for sixty years. The church needed someone with great potential from the Stoddard family to succeed him, and Jonathan was the ideal candidate. Jonathan became assistant minister to his grandfather at 24 years old and the pastor at age 26 when his grandfather went home with the Lord. At age 26, Jonathan became the pastor of one of the most prestigious and influential pulpits in New England.[8]

    Second, he married a very godly and capable lady, Sarah Edwards. She managed the household and their farm well, allowing Jonathan to spend most of his time studying and writing.

    Third, Edwards’ friend, Isaac Watt, published Edwards’ first full-length book in England in 1936, “A Faithful Narrative of the Surprising Work of God in the Conversion of Many Hundred Souls in Northampton.” The book was Edwards’ account on the revival at Northampton, thus giving Edwards a transatlantic reputation as a writer and minister.

    Forth, he met the younger English Anglican evangelist George Whitefield in 1940. Jonathan was the theologian, Whitefield was the preacher. Together they led the First Great Awakening in America.

    Fifth, one of his daughters, Jerusha, was in love with David Brainerd, a devoted missionary to the Indian who died at a young age. Edwards wrote a biography of David Brainerd in 1749 after his death. It was the first biography printed in America to gain international recognition and the first full missionary biography ever published. The biography became the most widely read of Edwards’ works.

    Sixth, Edwards would not have moved to Stockbridge to minister to the Mohicans and Mohawks Indians if not because of his dismissal from the Northampton church. And because he had more time at Stockbridge, he wrote some of his most influential works, including Freedom of the Will and The End for Which God Created The World.

    Seventh, if not because Edward’s son-in-law, Aaron Burr, the president of Princeton, suddenly died at 41-year-old, and the decision of the council of congregational pastors, Edwards would not have become the President of Princeton.

    Lastly, Edwards was born between the arrival of the Puritans of New England and the formation of the United States of America. As a result, his descendants and apprentices were among the leaders of the young Republic. Among them were a vice president of the United States, deans of law and medical schools, US senators, governors, majors, college presidents, judges, pastors, and professors.

    Conclusion

    Jonathan Edwards’ passion was to wholly devote himself to God. His passion for God can be observed at his young age in East Windsor, through his life as a minister of the gospel, and continued to his death as the President of Princeton University. God gifted him with a powerful logical mind, the ability to express his thoughts in writing, and the ability to preach powerful sermons. His life circumstances, including his family background, marriage, friends, ministry partners, dismissal from the Northampton church, and placement in history, have allowed him to exercise his passion and gifts to become one of the most influential theologians and pastors in New England in the history of North America.

    Bibliography

    Marsden, George M. A Short Life of Jonathan Edwards. Library of Religious Biography. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Pub, 2008.

    ———. Jonathan Edwards: A Life. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

    Murray, Iain H. Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography. Reprinted. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 2003.

    Nichols, Stephen J. Jonathan Edwards: A Guided Tour of His Life and Thought. Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Pub, 2001.

    Packer, J. I. A Quest for Godliness: The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life. 1st US trade pbk. ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1994.

    Piper, John, and Justin Taylor, eds. A God Entranced Vision of All Things: The Legacy of Jonathan Edwards. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2004.


    [1] That is the conclusion of many biographers of Edwards, including Stephen Nichols. He wrote: “In Edwards one sees the whole person – heart, soul, mind, and strength-devoted to God.” Stephen J. Nichols, Jonathan Edwards: A Guided Tour of His Life and Thought (Phillipsburg, N.J: P & R Pub, 2001), 21.

    [2] Even though Jonathan’s zeal for the Lord was transparent at twelve years old, he did not meet his dad standard and was not yet among those who could make profession. See George M. Marsden, Jonathan Edwards: A Life (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), 34.

    [3] Iain H. Murray, Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography, Reprinted (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 2003), 19.

    [4] Nichols, Jonathan Edwards, 38–39.

    [5] George M. Marsden, A Short Life of Jonathan Edwards, Library of Religious Biography (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Pub, 2008), 123.

    [6] J. I. Packer, A Quest for Godliness: The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life, 1st U.S. trade pbk. ed (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1994), 316.

    [7] The evidence of this is the rows of books on Edwards in the DTS library. For over 300 years, theologians and pastors continue to write about Edwards. This is true even in the 21st century America because “Evangelicalism today is America is basking in the sunlight of ominously hollow success”, wrote John Piper. See John Piper and Justin Taylor, eds., A God Entranced Vision of All Things: The Legacy of Jonathan Edwards (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2004), 21.

    [8] Nichols, Jonathan Edwards, 53.

  • The Biblical Theology and Applications of Pastors as Shepherds, Priests, Kings, Prophets, and Sages

    The Biblical Theology and Applications of Pastors as Shepherds, Priests, Kings, Prophets, and Sages

    Introduction

    The Old Testament depicts God calling five kinds of ministers to lead His covenanted people. They are the shepherds, the priests, the prophets, the kings, and the sages. And the New Testament depicts that all these five roles can be found in the Lord Jesus Christ as the ultimate Minister of God. The Lord is the Chief Shepherd, the great High Priest, the King of Kings, the Living Word, and the source of wisdom.

    Before the Lord ascended to heaven, He commissioned the apostle Peter to shepherd His flock (John 21:15-17). Later, Peter and the apostle Paul instructed other church leaders to do the same (1 Pet. 5:1-4; Acts 20:28-30). These church leaders are called elders, overseers, and pastors (Acts 20:17, 28; Eph. 4:11).[1]

    Paul frequently asked Christians to imitate him and Christ (1 Cor. 4:16; 11:1; 1 Thess. 1:6). He also instructed Christians to imitate God (Eph 5:1). Therefore, all Christians should imitate Christ, including pastors. Thenceforth, pastors should model their ministry after the five ministry roles of their Lord.[2] This paper aims to survey the biblical theology and ministry application of the roles of pastors as shepherds, priests, kings, prophets, and sages. 

    Pastors as Shepherds

    A Biblical Theology of Pastors as Shepherds

    Shepherd is a prominent metaphor for God in the Old Testament (Gen. 48:15; Ps. 23; Ezek. 34). God is portrayed as the ultimate Shepherd of His flock (Ps. 23:1). He called Moses as His undershepherd to lead His flock out of Egypt and through the wilderness (Ps. 77:20)[3]. Later in the exile period, God promised through Jeremiah that He would give to His people shepherds after His own heart (Jer. 3:15). 

    Then in the New Testament, the Lord Jesus was revealed as the Good Shepherd (John 10:11), the Chief Shepherd (1 Peter 5:4), and the Great Shepherd (Heb 13:20). He called some of His disciples as pastors to shepherd His flock. These pastors are His gift to His church (Eph. 4:11). Most commentators think the pastors and teachers are referring to the same office. The Greek word for pastors is ποιμένας (piomenas). It means shepherds. Most English translated it as pastors (NASB, NIV, NET, KJV), and a few translated it as shepherds (ESV). The English word for the term pastor was an anglicized form of the Latin/French term for shepherd[4].

    God as the Shepherd care of the Israelites should provide pastors with principles on shepherding God’s flock in the New Testament.[5] The role of a shepherd is to lead the flock of God as a servant leader[6]. A pastor is to feed the sheep of God (John 21:15-17), to shepherd the flock of God by being examples to the flock (1 Pet. 5:1-3), to equip the flocks for ministry by speaking the truth in love (Eph. 4:11-15), and to shepherd the flock of God by teaching the whole counsel of God to defend against false teachers (Acts 20:26-30; Tit. 1:9).

    Practical Applications of Pastors as Shepherds

    The most important duty of the pastor as a shepherd is to feed the flock by teaching and preaching the word of God to help the flock understand God’s word and how to apply God’s words in their life. This is accomplished primarily on the pulpit and complemented by other teaching ministries like Sunday school, special conferences, and retreats.

    The pastor should lead the flock by example. That means pastors are called to live with the people. The pastor must know the flocks, and the flocks must know their shepherds. Only by doing life together, the pastor can model life for the flocks. This means pastors should allocate time outside of Sunday to spend time with God’s people. “The most important asset of spiritual leadership is the power of an exemplary life.”[7]

    Pastoral care ministry is part of being a good shepherd. Therefore, a pastor should include visitation in his schedule. For example, he could visit the flocks at their home and workplace to get to know their work. Hospital visitation is at the heart of a pastoral care ministry.[8] A pastor should allocate time to visit the sick and the dying in the hospital. These are special moments to shepherd the patients and their families. We can offer a word of comfort from the scriptures and pray for them. Often, simply being there will bring comfort to people because they know we care for them.

    Pastoral counseling is different from pastoral care because pastoral counseling is done within a specific time arrangement to address specific issues of a sheep of God. “Pastoral counseling is individual sheep-tending, fulfilling our calling as undershepherds in the care of one (or a couple) of sheep in need of specific attention, and doing so after the example of the Good Shepherd.”[9]

    Pastors as Priests

    A Biblical Theology of Pastors as Priests

    In Old Testament, priests are men descendants of Aaron, who God chooses as spiritual leaders for His people. Priests are anointed leaders who bring the sacrifice of the people to God, teach God’s word (Lev. 10:11), inquire about the will of God (Ex. 28:30; Ez. 2:63), and pronounce blessings to God’s people (Num. 6:22-27). The prophets and the priests complement each other, “as the prophet stood to represent God, the priest entered God’s presence to represent man.”[10]

    The leader of the priests were the high priests, who were a shadow of our Lord (Heb. 8:1). Christ is the Great High Priest, after the order of Melchizedek (Ps. 110:4; Heb. 5:10, 6:20). He offered Himself as the blameless sacrifice to redeem our sins. Christ is currently serving the church as the Great High Priest in the heavenly by making intercession for believers (Heb. 7:25).

    In the New Testament, all believers are priests (1 Pet. 2:4, 9; Rev. 1:6). Therefore pastors should be careful not to replace the priesthood of all believers. We should not return to the error of the Roman Catholics, where the priests became a mediator between men and God. 

    How should a New Testament pastor think about his role as a priest? Paul wrote he was a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles in the priestly service of the gospel of God. He further wrote, “I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ has accomplished through me to bring the Gentiles to obedience… and thus I make it my ambition to preach the gospel…” (Rom. 15:16-20). The priestly ministry of a pastor is to preach the gospel. And be a model to believers on how to live as a priest in New Testament. So, a pastor should not think of himself as a priest above regular believers but as a priest with the other believers, proclaiming the gospel. Therefore, a pastor does not stand between the believers and Christ but helps connect believers to Christ. We are ambassadors of Christ; our role is to reconcile people to God on behalf of Christ (2 Cor. 5:20).

    Besides preaching the gospel, the pastor’s priestly service should include intercession ministry. One of the primary roles of a pastor is to be a prayer warrior (Acts 6:4). Paul exemplifies that with his prayers in his letters (Eph. 1:15-23; Phil. 1:3-11).

    Practical Applications of Pastors as Priests

    A pastor is a ministry of the gospel. It means our preaching should not only be pastoral to edify the church but should also be evangelistic to convert unbelievers. 

    When a pastor precedes a communion service, he displays the gospel to the congregation. First, the separation of the beard and the wine represent the death of Christ. Then, when the pastor breaks the unleavened bread, he reminds the congregation that Christ, the one without sins, died on the cross for us. 

    Similarly, when a pastor performs baptism on believers, he proclaims the gospel to the congregation. The full baptism immersion symbolizes the believer’s dead, buried, and resurrection with Christ.

    A pastor should make intercession prayer a priority of his ministry. We are to pray for the flocks of God in prayer meetings, during sermon preparations, in worship services, in our private prayer time, during pastoral care visits, and at weddings and funerals. The High Priest is praying for the church. We, as His ministers, should imitate Him.

    Pastors as Kings

    A Biblical Theology of Pastors as Kings

    God’s will to have kings to lead His people in the Old Testament. The kings of Israelites were anointed as a sign of being commissioned by God to lead His people (1 Sam. 10:10; 16:13; 24:6). The kings were supposed to fear God and lead God’s people by keeping the laws (Deut. 17:14-20). King David was the model of a God-fearing king. The significance of King David’s childhood as a shepherd is that he became a King with a shepherd’s heart. It matches the image of God in the Old Testament as the Shepherd and King of His people. “The divine Shepherd metaphor is often combined with the Lord’s royal reign.”[11] The kings led the people of God in offering sacrifices to worship the Lord (2 Sam. 24:25; 2 Sam. 6:17), blessed the people of God (2 Sam 6:18), administered justice, appointed leaders, stewarded the nation’s resources, and protect the nation by leading the nation in battles against the enemies. The propensity of the nation of Israelites is directed related to the king’s faithfulness to God.

    God made a covenant with David that one of his descendants would be king forever (2 Sam. 7:13). Later, the prophets frequently portrayed David as the Messiah in shepherd and king imageries (Ezek. 34:23-24). The Lord Jesus is the fulfillment of these prophecies. He is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords (Rev. 17:14). 

    Pastors should be king in the sense that pastors are called to lead the church of Christ (1 Tim. 5:17). They are to provide oversight to the church. However, pastors are warned not to dominate the church but to be an example to the flock (1 Pet. 5:2-4). The title of overseer speaks of the leadership responsibility of the pastors (Acts 20:28). Pastors are called to manage God’s household as a steward (Tit. 1:7) and mobilize the saints for ministry (Eph. 4:11-12). The pastors are chief warriors of God (2 Tim. 2:3). They are to lead the church in battles against the spiritual forces of evil (Eph. 6:12).

    Practical Applications of Pastor as King

    A pastor needs to be a good leader. He is to lead by example, preaching God’s word, mobilizing the saints for ministry, identifying leaders, delegating resources, and being a good steward of the resources God has entrusted to Him.

    The most senior pastor needs to lead the elders in humility and vision. He is the first among the equals. He is to lead with a vision but, at the same time, be humble in listening and collaborating with other pastors to create a unified team of leaders to lead the church.

    Pastors need to keep their eyes open for gifted men who have a passion for serving the Lord in the congregation. Pastors should be willing to invest in younger men to train them as future pastors for the church. We also need to identify, encourage, and train the women in the congregation who are gifted and called to be leaders among the women.

    Pastors need to lead by example. Like King David, our topmost priority is to fear the Lord and obey His words as an example for the flock. We are not to lead coercively but with humility as servant leaders.

    We need to learn the art of delegation. Our role as leaders is to identify the saints’ gifts and mobilize them for ministry. Therefore, we ought to regularly ask the Lord who can we delegate various ministries to create opportunities for God’s people to serve in the church using their God-given gifts.

    As leaders of the church, we need to watch out for attacks from the enemy. We must watch out for divisive issues and people in the church, attacks from cults, and temptations from the world that could affect the church’s spiritual condition. Once we identify a potential or existing danger, we ought to lead the church in combating the issue with the armors of God.

    Pastors as Prophets

    A Biblical Theology of Pastors as Prophets

    An Old Testament prophet is a witness for God, a pleader, a comforter, and a herald. [12] The prophet’s life was first transformed by the word of God before the prophets could proclaim the word of God to His people. When the prophets faithfully proclaim the word of God, it has the effect of fire and hammer to people’s hearts (Jer. 23:29). The true prophets of God were called to expose false prophets. Most prophets paid a high price to expose the people’s sins (Hos. 1-3; Heb. 11:36-38). Prophets are also called men of God (Deut. 33:1; 1 Sam. 9:6; 1 Kgs. 13:1). They are to live a holy life dedicated to God.

    The Lord Jesus was the Prophet of God who preached God’s message during His earthly ministry (Luke 2:47; 24:44). Not only that, but He is also the Logos (John 1:1), the Living. The Lord Jesus spoke what He heard from God the Father (John 8:28). He preached creatively with metaphors, parables, and stories. He quoted Old Testament in His messages and spoke with authority (John 14:10) and conviction. The Lord Jesus is God’s ultimate prophet and preacher (Heb. 1:2).

    Pastors have a similar role as Old Testament prophets because God called them both for a special ministry of the word, as massagers of God (Isa. 6:9, Jer. 1:5; 1 Tim. 2:7). Pastors are called to preach the word of God that cuts to the heart of men and women (Acts 2:37) by exposing the sins of men. Our aim is not to please men but to please God who tests our hearts (1 Thess. 2:4). We should preach with authority to convict sinners and bring people into repentance to reconcile sinners to God (2 Cor. 5:19). Like the prophets who paid the price to expose the sins of the Israelites and gentiles, pastors should be willing to pay the price to expose the sins of the church and the world.

    Like the prophets, pastors should also be men of God (1 Tim. 6:11, 3:1-7; Tit. 1:5-9). Pastors should live a godly life as an example to the flock (1 Pet. 5:3).[13]

    Practical Applications of Pastors as Prophets

    The primary application of pastors as prophets is at the pulpit, for the prophet is primarily the messenger of God. The prophets need to know what God wants in His people and proclaim the message to the people. For example, a prophet called sinners into repentance and established a relationship with God. A prophet should also know the condition of the people’s hearts, speak God’s word into their lives, and properly apply the scriptures to their lives.

    A pastor should be prepared to pay the price when he exposes sins in the church and the world. It means we may face criticism from people, lose future speaking opportunities, lose the pastorate, or at times face prison or death in certain parts of the world. 

    As preachers, we should be godly men. Therefore, we are not only concerned about our exposition of the Scripture and our passion for preaching, but we should be even more concerned about our characters. A pastor must be above reproach in character. He is not perfect, but he should be an example to the flock of God. That means a pastor should make his spiritual formation a priority.

    Pastors as Sages

    A Biblical Theology of Pastor as Sages

    In the Old Testament, the function of priests, kings, and prophets as leaders in the people of God is evident. However, one role in Old Testament that is not mentioned much is the role of a sage. Israelites considered the status of sages to be equivalent to the prophets and priests (Jer. 18:13). Commenting on this verse, Waltke wrote: “For wisdom, man needs both the priest with his תּוֹרָה, the prophet with his דָּבָר, and the sage with his עֵצָה.” The sages are the authors of the book of proverbs and Ecclesiastes. King Solomon was the most famous sage. They were others, but we know almost nothing about them (1 Kings 4:31; Prov 30:1; 31:1). Bruce Waltke wrote a paper to show that “the sages and the prophets were true spiritual yokefellows sharing the same Lord, cultus, faith, hope, anthropology, and epistemology, speaking with the same authority, and making similar religious and ethical demands on their hearers.”[14] “Working in a context previously established and defined by the priest and prophet, the sages pointed their hearers to the ethical demands of the law.”[15] They taught people how to live with wisdom by the fear of the Lord (Prov 1:7).

    Christ is presented as the One greater than Solomon (Matt 12:42) in the New Testament. Furthermore, Paul wrote that all the treasures of wisdom and understanding are hidden in Christ (Col 2:3). Therefore, it is not surprising that the Jews in Nazareth were amazed by the Lord’s wisdom in his teaching (Matt 13:54). 

    The sages functioned very much as Christian pastors in our ministry between Sundays.[16] Therefore, it is wise for pastors to search the Old Testament wisdom books for principles and insights on how to minister as sages. Pastors need to regularly ask God for wisdom in ministry (James 1:5). We need to make our relationship with Christ our top priority because all treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hidden in Christ (Col 2:3).

    Practical Applications of Pastors as Sages

    As sages, pastors need to have the wisdom to take care of their personal life. Before the pastor care for the flocks of God, he should care for themselves and their family. It takes a lot of wisdom to know when to rest, how to protect the time with our spouses and children, who we should look for to shepherd our soul[17], when to say no to a ministry opportunity, and many other challenges that could deplete our energy.

    As preachers, we need a lot of wisdom to know how to apply the Scriptures to people’s life. First, we need to know the flock enough to understand their struggles, doubts, and needs and then ask God to give us the wisdom to apply the Scripture in sermons.

    Second, we need to depend on God constantly for pastoral care and counseling wisdom. Life is complicated, and ministry is messy. Applying the Scriptures in difficult life situations requires heavenly wisdom from God. We also need the wisdom to know when God stopped speaking in the Scriptures. Sometimes the Scriptures just do not have the answers for a life situation, and we need to have the wisdom to tell others we do not know the answers. Still, we know the One who does, our job is to direct them to seek comfort in trusting the sovereign and loving God even without knowing why they had to suffer in life.

    Lastly, there are times the church needs changes to conform more to the biblical patterns. Once we have identified an area that needs improvement, we will need wisdom from God to know when and how to make these changes.

    Conclusion

    God has called five kinds of ministers in the Old Testament to lead His people: the shepherds, the priests, the kings, the prophets, and the sages. These five ministers culminated in our Lord Jesus Christ in the New Testament. He is the Chief Shepherd, the Great High Priest, the King of Kings, the Living Word, and the source of wisdom. Since all Christians are called to imitate Christ, the pastors of the flock should also imitate Christ. Therefore, all pastors should model their ministries after the Chief Shepherd. In the paper, we have provided a brief biblical theology of each of the roles, tracing the biblical development from Old Testament to Christ, the Chief Shepherd, and the pastors, His undershepherd in the New Testament. We have also provided practical ministry applications following the biblical theology section for each role. I benefited tremendously in my understanding of pastoral theology and ministry applications because of this study. I hope the same for you.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Akin, Daniel L., and R. Scott Pace. Pastoral Theology: Theological Foundations for Who a Pastor Is and What He Does. Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Academic, 2017.

    Allison, Gregg R. Sojourners and Strangers: The Doctrine of the Church. Foundations of Evangelical Theology Series. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012.

    Hughes, R. Kent, and Douglas Sean O’Donnell. The Pastor’s Book: A Comprehensive and Practical Guide to Pastoral Ministry. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway, 2015.

    Johnson, John. “The Old Testament Offices as Paradigm for Pastoral Identity.” Bibliotheca Sacra 152 (1995).

    Laniak, Timothy S. Shepherds after My Own Heart: Pastoral Traditions and Leadership in the Bible. New Studies in Biblical Theology 20. Leicester, England : Downers Grove, Ill: Apollos ; InterVarsity Press, 2006.

    MacArthur, John, Richard Mayhue, Robert Thomas, and James Stitzinger. Pastoral Ministry: How to Shepherd Biblically. The John MacArthur Pastor’s Library. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc, 2005.

    Newton, Phil A. 40 Questions about Pastoral Ministry. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic, 2021.

    Oden, Thomas C. Pastoral Theology: Essentials of Ministry. 1st ed. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982.

    Peterson, Eugene H. Five Smooth Stones for Pastoral Work. Grand Rapids, Mich. : Leominster, Eng: WB Eerdmans ; Gracewing, 1992.

    Senkbeil, Harold L. The Care of Souls: Cultivating a Pastor’s Heart. Lexham Press, 2019.

    Senkbeil, Harold L., and Lucas V. Woodford. Pastoral Leadership: For the Care of Souls. Lexham Ministry Guides. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2021.

    Thomas, Griffith. The Work of The Ministry. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1911.

    Waltke, Bruce. “The Book of Proverbs and Old Testament Theology.” Bibliotheca Sacra 136 (1979).


    [1] Gregg R. Allison, Sojourners and Strangers: The Doctrine of the Church, Foundations of Evangelical Theology Series (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012), 212.

    [2] Thomas C. Oden, Pastoral Theology: Essentials of Ministry, 1st ed (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982), 60.

    [3] Timothy S. Laniak, Shepherds after My Own Heart: Pastoral Traditions and Leadership in the Bible, New Studies in Biblical Theology 20 (Leicester, England : Downers Grove, Ill: Apollos ; InterVarsity Press, 2006), chap. YHWH, Moses and the “flock” of God in the wilderness.

    [4] Laniak, Shepherds after My Own Heart, Introduction.

    [5] Phil A Newton, 40 Questions about Pastoral Ministry (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic, 2021), 21.

    [6] Daniel L. Akin and R. Scott Pace, Pastoral Theology: Theological Foundations for Who a Pastor Is and What He Does (Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Academic, 2017), 224.

    [7] John MacArthur et al., Pastoral Ministry: How to Shepherd Biblically, The John MacArthur Pastor’s Library (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc, 2005), 23.

    [8] Hughes and O’Donnell, The Pastor’s Book, 523.

    [9] R. Kent Hughes and Douglas Sean O’Donnell, The Pastor’s Book: A Comprehensive and Practical Guide to Pastoral Ministry (Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway, 2015), 470.

    [10] John Johnson, “The Old Testament Offices as Paradigm for Pastoral Identity,” Bibliotheca Sacra 152 (1995): 187.

    [11] Akin and Pace, Pastoral Theology, 211.

    [12] Griffith Thomas, The Work of The Ministry (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1911), 7.

    [13] Thomas, The Work of The Ministry, 23.

    [14] Waltke, “The Book of Proverbs and Old Testament Theology,” 304.

    [15] Johnson, “The Old Testament Offices as Paradigm for Pastoral Identity,” 188.

    [16] Eugene H. Peterson, Five Smooth Stones for Pastoral Work (Grand Rapids, Mich. : Leominster, Eng: W.B. Eerdmans ; Gracewing, 1992), 166.

    [17] Harold L. Senkbeil, The Care of Souls: Cultivating a Pastor’s Heart (Lexham Press, 2019), 238.